w1z4rd said:Rather go the KDE version of Ubuntu called Kubuntu. I promise you, as a new user, it will be both easier for you to learn and use, and the chances of you of having hardware problems are less likely with Kubuntu or ubuntu than with MS Windows or RedHat.
Ubuntu ships with gnome as its desktop. A practial, simple, look thats pretty stable.
Kubuntu, is ubuntu, but with the KDE desktop. OMG SEXY desktop stuff. About as stable as windows if you are like me, and go for beta packages the whole time.
w1z4rd said:www.kubuntu.org to download and choose the power PC version. I have i686 archtecture, so I went with i686 instead of i 386. If your system was bought in the last year, thats the option I would go with. If its older than a year, chances are its i386.
If its really old, you might wanna have a look at xubuntu.
dd1313 said:Thanks
So the major diference between ubunthu and kubunthu is the desktop !
Do I choose desktop or alternate cd ?
i686= Is that the AMD 64 bit version ?
thin-client networks...What is this ?
DD
dd1313 said:Thanks
So the major diference between ubunthu and kubunthu is the desktop !
Do I choose desktop or alternate cd ?
i686= Is that the AMD 64 bit version ?
thin-client networks...What is this ?
DD
graviti said:Personally I've never like Ubuntu. Just because it is a single CD install. Then anything else you have to download and install. At least with Fedora Core or SUSE, you can download the ISO's, and if you want to install on more than one machine, it doesn't require downloading things twice.
I'm aware you can set the first machine up as a repository, and use it in the installation of the second machine, but tell that to a beginner. openSUSE is just as easy as any other to install, and has a serious amount of software in it's 5 CD install. Fedora Core as well. The nice thing about FC is that if you have the Red Hat Bible that so many people do have, 90% of the concepts still apply, so there's no need to use up precious bandwidth looking for help on doing a particular task.
I'm not dissing Ubuntu, just saying that I prefer SUSE and Fedora.
Furthermore, depending on where you live, there's more than likely a LUG (Linux User Group) in your area who can supply you the CD's in exchange for blank CD's. Contact offlist if you need a bit of info
nic777 said:Choose Desktop, not the alternate CD, and i686 or i386
http://ubuntu.intergenia.de/releases/kubuntu/6.06/kubuntu-6.06-desktop-i386.iso
dd1313 said:Thanks
Is i686 the 64 bit version ?
DD
dd1313 said:Thanks
How would we rate red hat 9 to the latest fedora.I mean in windows terms
is it like win95 to XP to 2000 to XP...etc
Thanks
DD
Nice article!nic777 said:Since you starting out in Linux, you HAVE to read this, so you know what you are actually going into when you start using linux: http://linux.oneandoneis2.org/LNW.htm
stepper said:Nice article!
Been using Ubuntu since Warty to the present Dapper and I like it.
KDE vs GNOME: lets just say QT progs crashes a lot on my PC thats why I prefer GTK.
dd1313 said:HI
Please explain a little more what you mean by QT and GTK
Thanks
DD