Research Project on Peoples perceptions of genetically modified food

Lounger

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
3,367
Do you work for a GM company (like Monsanto). If so then I recommend non-cooperation.

BTW, your link doesn't work. Needs modifying (lol).
 

HapticSimian

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
15,950
Making your entry into a forum (with an 18+ age restriction... :p ) by spamming an external link across multiple threads isn't likely to win you too many friends.

That being said, bring on the mutant foodstuffs! It's the only hope we've got to feed our growing population. People who are against GM foods are luddites of the highest order.
 

spiderz

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
35,105
oohhh....will i be able to speak to my food while eating it? :D
 

Lounger

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
3,367
Making your entry into a forum (with an 18+ age restriction... :p ) by spamming an external link across multiple threads isn't likely to win you too many friends.

That being said, bring on the mutant foodstuffs! It's the only hope we've got to feed our growing population. People who are against GM foods are luddites of the highest order.
We are the informed. The rest are the sheep (cloned, I might add).:D
 

stricken

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
2,265
People who are against GM foods are luddites of the highest order.

Completely agreed. No real difference between a banana and a RoundUp enhanced soy bean. The one was bred, the other one was engineered. Both fall in the category of GM (Genetic Modification)

In fact, breathing city air is statistically 100 000x more hazardous to your health than eating a GM modified crop.

But these "luddites" dont bother to read up on GM, rather resorting to uninformed, ignorant "opinion" because its easier and requires less effort.

EDIT: Re the OP, please remember to include recent news of splicing human gelatin producing genes into plants ala Soylent Green. ; )
 

dj_jyno

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
4,206
Completely agreed. No real difference between a banana and a RoundUp enhanced soy bean.
Really? So you're telling me that a banana with new characteristics obtained through breeding also contains a tobacco mosaic virus vector? People who are opposed to GM, especially the way Monsanto does things, are quite well-informed.

GM crops used in controlled studies have been shown to even have toxic effects on lab rats' liver and kidney cells. This while the control group were fed exactly the same amount of food from a non-GM crop. One specific initial report concluded that there was no statistically significant effects, because the person who processed the data worked for the company who created the maize. A reprocessing of the data indicated that there was actually a statistically significant difference in the rats that ate GM maize.

Second reason why GM crops are bad - genetic diversity. If one company supplies all the seeds for a certain crop, all the old variants would eventually vanish (either through farmers not planting older variants and producing seed, or cross-pollination with GM crops). A study was done in Mexico that found traces of GM crops in normal fields, even though they had a ban on importing GM seeds at the time. This was caused by cross-pollination.

Litigation also comes into play. Due to the GM plants being registered, the companies can sue farmers who are found to have GM products in their harvest. How insane is that; sueing someone for something bees and the wind brought to your farm.

Don't believe the hype that GM crops are always better (possible long-term health effects aside). There have been cases where plants bred outside of a lab have shown superior drought, water or pest resistance to their GM competitors.

Was that ignorant, ill-read and uninformed enough?
 

ichigo

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
9,252
I answered No unless they can prove it is not harmful to the body
 

K3NS31

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
3,940
I reckon this is hardly a "yes" or "no" question.
For example, if you look at dj_jyno's objections, you'd have to note that GM crops are only bad for biodiversity and pose legal risks IF they've been modified in such a way as to prevent them from being able to reproduce. And yes, many have been, but that simply means the companies doing the GM are bad, not that GM in itself is a bad thing. The same goes for registering strains etc.

Like most things, you can add good mods or bad mods. Just cos bad mods MIGHT be prevalent at the moment, does that mean the whole concept isn't worth it?

What I don't buy into is those weirdo's who say something's bad just cos it isn't "natural". Hey, guess what? Cyanide's natural. I don't see you eating that.

Anyway, your question's pretty vague, when one looks at all the factors surrounding the issue, but I'll go with "yes".
 
Top