jibo82
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2008
- Messages
- 211
Hi guys,
So I just bought a house and am busy getting quotes for damp related repairs that needs to be done.
So far Ive had two guys come to give me quotes and they seem to have vastly different opinions on how they will tackle the damp.
The main issue is rising damp all across the house (mostly just exterior).
The first guy says he will dig a to 40cm below the ground and above the ground up to wherever the damage is. He will chop the plaster up to the brick both below and above the ground. Then he will apply some waterproofing layer to the brick, then apply some membrane and then plaster (damp proof plaster) and then apply another waterproofing layer (cemex or something like that). The perimeter walls also have some large cracks which he will patch up the same way include applying brackets to join the cracked walls together where necessary.
The second guy reckons there is no need to go below the ground with the plastering. He say the rising damp is caused because the original plastering was done too deep and is below the damp proof course layer of the floor. He says the plaster acts as a conduit for the water. He will break the existing plaster to the brick up to 30cm above affected areas. He will then add a layer of waterproofing and then plaster (mixing plaster with some compound to damp proof it) and then add another layer of water proofing. I may have missed a few details here. Another area he defers from the first guy is that he will inject a damp-proofing cream into the walls on areas where the damp has affecter the interior walls. The first guy insists that this is ineffective. He will then fix the cracks in the perimeter wall by converting them to expansion joints (shoving slate in between the two cracks or something like that).
So who do I go with. The first guy quoted me 30k, the second 50k. Both seem to know what they are talking about.
What do you guys think about how deep the plastering should be and the effectiveness of damp proofing creams injected into the walls?
So I just bought a house and am busy getting quotes for damp related repairs that needs to be done.
So far Ive had two guys come to give me quotes and they seem to have vastly different opinions on how they will tackle the damp.
The main issue is rising damp all across the house (mostly just exterior).
The first guy says he will dig a to 40cm below the ground and above the ground up to wherever the damage is. He will chop the plaster up to the brick both below and above the ground. Then he will apply some waterproofing layer to the brick, then apply some membrane and then plaster (damp proof plaster) and then apply another waterproofing layer (cemex or something like that). The perimeter walls also have some large cracks which he will patch up the same way include applying brackets to join the cracked walls together where necessary.
The second guy reckons there is no need to go below the ground with the plastering. He say the rising damp is caused because the original plastering was done too deep and is below the damp proof course layer of the floor. He says the plaster acts as a conduit for the water. He will break the existing plaster to the brick up to 30cm above affected areas. He will then add a layer of waterproofing and then plaster (mixing plaster with some compound to damp proof it) and then add another layer of water proofing. I may have missed a few details here. Another area he defers from the first guy is that he will inject a damp-proofing cream into the walls on areas where the damp has affecter the interior walls. The first guy insists that this is ineffective. He will then fix the cracks in the perimeter wall by converting them to expansion joints (shoving slate in between the two cracks or something like that).
So who do I go with. The first guy quoted me 30k, the second 50k. Both seem to know what they are talking about.
What do you guys think about how deep the plastering should be and the effectiveness of damp proofing creams injected into the walls?
