Rosetta's lander Philae, faces eternal hibernation

Zyraz

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
2,658
Silent since its last call to mothership Rosetta seven months ago, the Philae lander is facing conditions on Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from which it is unlikely to recover.

Rosetta, which continues its scientific investigations at the comet until September before its own comet-landing finale, has in recent months been balancing science observations with flying dedicated trajectories optimised to listen out for Philae. But the lander has remained silent since 9 July 2015.

"The chances for Philae to contact our team at our lander control centre are unfortunately getting close to zero," says Stephan Ulamec, Philae project manager at the German Aerospace Center, DLR. "We are not sending commands any more and it would be very surprising if we were to receive a signal again."

Philae's team of expert engineers and scientists at the German, French and Italian space centres and across Europe have carried out extensive investigations to try to understand the status of the lander, piecing together clues since it completed its first set of scientific activities after its historic landing on 12 November 2014.

A story with incredible twists and turns unfolded on that day. In addition to a faulty thruster, Philae also failed to fire its harpoons and lock itself onto the surface of the comet after its seven-hour descent, bouncing from its initial touchdown point at Agilkia, to a new landing site, Abydos, over 1 km away. The precise location of the lander has yet to be confirmed in high-resolution images.

A reconstruction of the flight of the lander suggested that it made contact with the comet four times during its two-hour additional flight across the small comet lobe. After bouncing from Agilkia it grazed the rim of the Hatmehit depression, bounced again, and then finally settled on the surface at Abydos.

Even after this unplanned excursion, the lander was still able to make an impressive array of science measurements, with some even as it was flying above the surface after the first bounce.

Once the lander had made its final touchdown, science and operations teams worked around the clock to adapt the experiments to make the most of the unanticipated situation. About 80% of its initial planned scientific activities were completed.

In the 64 hours following its separation from Rosetta, Philae took detailed images of the comet from above and on the surface, sniffed out organic compounds, and profiled the local environment and surface properties of the comet, providing revolutionary insights into this fascinating world.

But with insufficient sunlight falling on Philae's new home to charge its secondary batteries, the race was on to collect and transmit the data to Rosetta and across 510 million kilometres of space back to Earth before the lander's primary battery was exhausted as expected. Thus, on the evening of 14-15 November 2014, Philae fell into hibernation.

As the comet and the spacecraft moved closer to the Sun ahead of perihelion on 13 August 2015 - the closest point to the Sun along its orbit - there were hopes that Philae would wake up again.

Estimates of the thermal conditions at the landing site suggested that the lander might receive enough sunlight to start warming up to the minimum -45+ C required for it to operate on the surface even by the end of March 2015.

It is worth noting that if Philae had remained at its original landing site of Agilkia, it would have likely overheated by March, ending any further operations.

On 13 June 2015, the lander finally hailed the orbiting Rosetta and subsequently transmitted housekeeping telemetry, including information from its thermal, power and computer subsystems.

Subsequent analysis of the data indicated that the lander had in fact already woken up on 26 April 2015, but had been unable to send any signals until 13 June.

The fact that the lander had survived the multiple impacts on 12 November and then unfavourable environmental conditions, greatly exceeding the specifications of its various electronic components, was quite remarkable.

After 13 June, Philae made a further seven intermittent contacts with Rosetta in the following weeks, with the last coming on 9 July. However, the communications links that were established were too short and unstable to enable any scientific measurements to be commanded.

Despite the improved thermal conditions, with temperatures inside Philae reaching 0+ C, no further contacts were made as the comet approached perihelion in August.

However, the months around perihelion are also the comet's most active. With increased levels of outflowing gas and dust, conditions were too challenging for Rosetta to operate safely close enough to the comet and within the 200 km where the signals had previously been detected from Philae.

In more recent months, the comet's activity has subsided enough to make it possible to approach the nucleus again safely - this week the spacecraft reached around 45 km - and Rosetta has made repeated passes over Abydos.

No signal has been received, however. Attempts to send commands 'in the blind' to trigger a response from Philae have also not produced any results.

The mission engineers think that failures of Philae's transmitters and receivers are the most likely explanation for the irregular contacts last year, followed by continued silence into this year.

Another difficulty that Philae may be facing is dust covering its solar panels, ejected by the comet during the active perihelion months, preventing the lander from powering up.

Also, the attitude and even location of Philae may have changed since November 2014 owing to cometary activity, meaning that the direction in which its antenna is sending signals to Rosetta is not as predicted, affecting the expected communication window.

"The comet's level of activity is now decreasing, allowing Rosetta to safely and gradually reduce its distance to the comet again," says Sylvain Lodiot, ESA's Rosetta spacecraft operations manager.

"Eventually we will be able to fly in 'bound orbits' again, approaching to within 10-20 km - and even closer in the final stages of the mission - putting us in a position to fly above Abydos close enough to obtain dedicated high-resolution images to finally locate Philae and understand its attitude and orientation."

"Determining Philae's location would also allow us to better understand the context of the incredible in situ measurements already collected, enabling us to extract even more valuable science from the data," says Matt Taylor, ESA's Rosetta project scientist.

"Philae is the cherry on the cake of the Rosetta mission, and we are eager to see just where the cherry really is!"

At the same time, Rosetta, Philae and the comet are heading back out towards the outer Solar System again. They have crossed the orbit of Mars and are now some 350 million km from the Sun. According to predictions, the temperatures should be falling far below those at which Philae is expected to be able to operate.

Nevertheless, while hopes of making contact again with Philae dwindle, Rosetta will continue to listen for signals from the lander as it flies alongside the comet ahead of its own comet landing in September.

"We would be very surprised to hear from Philae again after so long, but we will keep Rosetta's listening channel on until it is no longer possible due to power constraints as we move ever further from the Sun towards the end of the mission," says Patrick Martin, ESA's Rosetta mission manager.

"Philae has been a tremendous challenge and for the lander teams to have achieved the science results that they have in the unexpected and difficult circumstances is something we can all be proud of.

"The combined achievements of Rosetta and Philae, rendezvousing with and landing on a comet, are historic high points in space exploration."

Source

Will this probe be discovered one day far away in to the future by human space miners or even non human travellers ?
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
Most likely it will just drift in space forever, or be burned up when the comet is dragged into some astral body's gravitational field.
 

Zyraz

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
2,658
Most likely it will just drift in space forever, or be burned up when the comet is dragged into some astral body's gravitational field.

Logic tells you this is the most likely scenario. The geeky child in me hopes that an astral event might send the comet on a trajectory that leaves our solar system into deep space to be discovered by future generations of explorers , human or non-human . Its a pity we will never live long enough to find out where and when this story ends. (does make for a good Sci-fi movie plot) :eek:
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
Logic tells you this is the most likely scenario. The geeky child in me hopes that an astral event might send the comet on a trajectory that leaves our solar system into deep space to be discovered by future generations of explorers , human or non-human . Its a pity we will never live long enough to find out where and when this story ends. (does make for a good Sci-fi movie plot) :eek:

Yep, Romantic futurism versus the cold hard realities of science. I hear you.
 

Zyraz

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
2,658
Yep, Romantic futurism versus the cold hard realities of science. I hear you.

I will remember that little probe forever .
I was one of "those" that followed every little moment of its journey that unfortunately probably ends for me now. The curiosity in me wants to know whether the story really ends or is just put on hold.
The sadness comes with the realization that I`ll probably never know.
Its like having your favourite movie / series ends on a cliffhanger (pun intended of course ;) ) and you find out the next instalment has been cancelled . :crying:
 

Compton_effect

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
12,292
Guys. The comet has a orbital period of 2398 days - that's 6 and a half years. Its not going to go into the depths of space and never return.
Which makes it a nice target for a follow up mission in the next 10 years.
By then we'd have figured out where the probe went.

Unless a outgassing event blew it off the comet and its drifting through space, trying to radio back that its still operational.
 

Zyraz

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
2,658
Guys. The comet has a orbital period of 2398 days - that's 6 and a half years. Its not going to go into the depths of space and never return.
Which makes it a nice target for a follow up mission in the next 10 years.
By then we'd have figured out where the probe went.

Unless a outgassing event blew it off the comet and its drifting through space, trying to radio back that its still operational.

Logic tells you this is the most likely scenario. The geeky child in me hopes that an astral event might send the comet on a trajectory that leaves our solar system into deep space to be discovered by future generations of explorers , human or non-human . Its a pity we will never live long enough to find out where and when this story ends. (does make for a good Sci-fi movie plot) :eek:

It is in orbit now , but an Astral event might change that with a trajectory alteration.
Unfortunately the facts point to us not living to see the day that the probe is physically found and retrieved.
So as long as the comet is alive , in theory the story is not over . My sadness/curiosity comes from the fact that I wont live to find out what happens next.
It would have been easier to accept the loss , if it was total loss with no chance for Philae to be found eg. absorption by the sun , etc.
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
Guys. The comet has a orbital period of 2398 days - that's 6 and a half years. Its not going to go into the depths of space and never return.
Which makes it a nice target for a follow up mission in the next 10 years.
By then we'd have figured out where the probe went.

Unless a outgassing event blew it off the comet and its drifting through space, trying to radio back that its still operational.

Holding thumbs, but the odds seem so slim.
 

Zyraz

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
2,658
Yep, Romantic futurism versus the cold hard realities of science. I hear you.

By the way my curiosity for what happens next extends past just Philae .
Voyager probes , New Horizons are also on my Romantic futurism (as LazyLion puts it) thoughts .
Only difference is that the latter named probes are still capable of telling us about their journey (which will also change as time goes by)
 

Zyraz

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
2,658

How comets are born



Rosetta_NavCam_comet_67P_20150322_enhanced_625.jpg
Detailed analysis of data collected by Rosetta show that comets are the ancient leftovers of early Solar System formation, and not younger fragments resulting from subsequent collisions between other, larger bodies. Understanding how and when objects like Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko took shape is of utmost importance in determining how exactly they can be used to interpret the formation and early evolution of our Solar System.

A new study addressing this question led by Bjorn Davidsson of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in Pasadena (USA), has been published in Astronomy and Astrophysics.

If comets are primordial, then they could help reveal the properties of the solar nebula from which the Sun, planets and small bodies condensed 4.6 billion years ago, and the processes that transformed our planetary system into the architecture we see today.

The alternative hypothesis is that they are younger fragments resulting from collisions between older 'parent' bodies such as icy trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs). They would then provide insight into the interior of such larger bodies, the collisions that disrupted them, and the process of building new bodies from the remains of older ones. "Either way, comets have been witness to important Solar System evolution events, and this is why we have made these detailed measurements with Rosetta - along with observations of other comets - to find out which scenario is more likely," says Matt Taylor, ESA's Rosetta project scientist.

During its two-year sojourn at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, Rosetta has revealed a picture of the comet as a low-density, high-porosity, double-lobed body with extensive layering, suggesting that the lobes accumulated material over time before they merged.

The unusually high porosity of the interior of the nucleus provides the first indication that this growth cannot have been via violent collisions, as these would have compacted the fragile material. Structures and features on different size scales observed by Rosetta's cameras provide further information on how this growth may have taken place.

Earlier work showed that the head and body were originally separate objects, but the collision that merged them must have been at low speed in order not to destroy both of them. The fact that both parts have similar layering also tells us that they must have undergone similar evolutionary histories and that survival rates against catastrophic collision must have been high for a significant period of time.

Merging events may also have happened on smaller scales. For example, three spherical 'caps' have been identified in the Bastet region on the small comet lobe, and suggestions are that they are remnants of smaller cometesimals that are still partially preserved today. At even smaller scales of just a few metres across, there are the so-called 'goosebumps' and 'clod' features, rough textures observed in numerous pits and exposed cliff walls in various locations on the comet.

While it is possible that this morphology might arise from fracturing alone, it is actually thought to represent an intrinsic 'lumpiness' of the comet's constituents. That is, these 'goosebumps' could be showing the typical size of the smallest cometesimals that accumulated and merged to build up the comet, made visible again today through erosion due to sunlight.

According to theory, the speeds at which cometesimals collide and merge change during the growth process, with a peak when the lumps have sizes of a few metres. For this reason, metre-sized structures are expected to be the most compact and resilient, and it is particularly interesting that the comet material appears lumpy on that particular size scale.

Further lines of evidence include spectral analysis of the comet's composition showing that the surface has experienced little or no in situ alteration by liquid water, and analysis of the gases ejected from sublimating ices buried deeper within the surface, which finds the comet to be rich in supervolatiles such as carbon monoxide, oxygen, nitrogen and argon.

These observations imply that comets formed in extremely cold conditions and did not experience significant thermal processing during most of their lifetimes. Instead, to explain the low temperatures, survival of certain ices and retention of supervolatiles, they must have accumulated slowly over a significant time period.

"While larger TNOs in the outer reaches of the Solar System appear to have been heated by short-lived radioactive substances, comets don't seem to show similar signs of thermal processing. We had to resolve this paradox by taking a detailed look at the time line of our current Solar System models, and consider new ideas," says Bjorn.

Bjorn and colleagues propose that the larger members of the TNO population formed rapidly within the first one million years of the solar nebula, aided by turbulent gas streams that rapidly accelerated their growth to sizes of up to 400 km.

Around three million years into the Solar System's history, gas had disappeared from the solar nebula, only leaving solid material behind. Then, over a much longer period of around 400 million years, the already massive TNOs slowly accreted further material and underwent compaction into layers, their ices melting and refreezing, for example. Some TNOs even grew into Pluto or Triton-sized objects.

Comets took a different path. After the rapid initial growth phase of the TNOs, leftover grains and 'pebbles' of icy material in the cold, outer parts of the solar nebula started to come together at low velocity, yielding comets roughly 5 km in size by the time gas has disappeared from the solar nebula. The low speeds at which the material accumulated led to objects with fragile nuclei with high porosity and low density.

This slow growth also allowed comets to preserve some of the oldest, volatile-rich material from the solar nebula, since they were able to release the energy generated by radioactive decay inside them without heating up too much.

The larger TNOs played a further role in the evolution of comets. By 'stirring' the cometary orbits, additional material was accreted at somewhat higher speed over the next 25 million years, forming the outer layers of comets. The stirring also made it possible for the few kilometre-sized objects in size to bump gently into each other, leading to the bi-lobed nature of some observed comets.

"Comets do not appear to display the characteristics expected for collisional rubble piles, which result from the smash-up of large objects like TNOs. Rather, we think they grew gently in the shadow of the TNOs, surviving essentially undamaged for 4.6 billion years," concludes Bjorn.

"Our new model explains what we see in Rosetta's detailed observations of its comet, and what had been hinted at by previous comet flyby missions."

"Comets really are the treasure-troves of the Solar System," adds Matt.

"They give us unparalleled insight into the processes that were important in the planetary construction yard at these early times and how they relate to the Solar System architecture that we see today."

Research paper: "The primordial nucleus of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko," by B. Davidsson et al. is published in Astronomy and Astrophysics, A and A 2016, Vol. 592, A63.

Source
 
Top