Royal Wedding Official Photographer

d7e7r7

Executive Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
8,905
Hugo Burnand has this week been officially named as photographer for the wedding of Kate Middleton and Prince William. Hugo's passion for photography began as a youngster, developing pictures in a kitchen made into a makeshift darkroom. When he was seven he won the Cheam School Photographic Competition. Hugo now runs a studio in Notting Hill, London. With just over a week to go before the big day, Amateur Photographer tracked him down to find out more…
Full interview here: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.u...d_reveals_all_update_news_307097.html?aff=rss

His Website is here: http://www.hugofoto.com

article-1382178-0BD8AE7800000578-235_472x423.jpg

Hugo Burnand

What do you guy's think he used for the wedding photographs in terms of camera?

Nikon D3? Canon 5D MkII? Canon 1ds MkIII?

Nope... He used a 50 Megapixel Hasselblad H4D-50 - Price tag: R 304,875.00 (just for body, no lenses included in the price :eek:)

131449-hasselblad-h4d-50-2094.jpg


One can only dream :rolleyes:

Official Wedding Photographs on The British Monarchy's flickr site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishmonarchy/sets/72157626613171058/
 
Last edited:

Centaur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
355
Nikon D3? Canon 5D MkII? Canon 1ds MkIII?

Nope... He used a 50 Megapixel Hasselblad H4D-50 - Price tag: R 304,875.00 (just for body, no lenses included in the price :eek:)

:eek: wow. I don't want to zoom into the queen's mouth with that type of quality, who knows what pieces of food one will find. :wtf:
 

d7e7r7

Executive Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
8,905
It's slow!

And ugly ;)

If you're referring to the camera:
It's got a fram rate of 1.1 fps:
Capture rate:
1.1 seconds per capture. 33 captures per minute
Which IMHO is more than sufficient for the task at hand.

As for ugly, who cares? You don't look at the camera afterwards, you look at the images it produces...
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,378
If you're referring to the camera:
It's got a fram rate of 1.1 fps:

Which IMHO is more than sufficient for the task at hand.

As for ugly, who cares? You don't look at the camera afterwards, you look at the images it produces…
Exactly, but then why would anyone have expected him to use Nikon a D3, Canon 5D MkII, or Canon 1ds MkIII?
 
Last edited:

GreGorGy

BULLSFAN
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
15,289
F
Nope... He used a 50 Megapixel Hasselblad H4D-50 - Price tag: R 304,875.00 (just for body, no lenses included in the price :eek:)

No way. Shop around.... R197,155.49

Say, am I a Philistine or am I not alone in finding these people less-than-hot? Princess Di woulda scored about a 7 maybe an 8 on my classic 1 to 10. No, just a seven now that I think about it, seriously.
 

koffiejunkie

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
9,588
Say, am I a Philistine or am I not alone in finding these people less-than-hot? Princess Di woulda scored about a 7 maybe an 8 on my classic 1 to 10. No, just a seven now that I think about it, seriously.

The royals? Ditto. Kate, on the other hand, is pretty. She just had way too much makeup plastered on :(
 
Top