Define what you classify as proof then... You keep banging the its Fake, its BS drum with zero to back it up...
So provide us with a clarification of what you deem is proof, and then we can talk...
- independently verifiable
- independently verified as authentic and untampered
- direct link to the actual deed(s)
all three need to be in place before something would count as solid proof, a statement by Ukraine for example fails on all three, as does "investigations" by journalists who are both aligned with the pro-Ukraine agenda and lack any qualifications to forensically determine whether the evidence they see is authentic ... who only arrived on scene days later anyway
I truly wonder if an independent investigation is even possible, who would conduct it???
hypothetically if we were to find truly independent investigators, they would need to find something like:
- forensic proof that the bodies were actually killed at the exact time and exact place as reported
- that whatever weapon was used, was held by a Russian at the time, down to the serial number of the weapon and e.g. the barrel matching the bullet
times that by the number of victims, it is essentially an impossible task I think ... the sheer size of the task, the fog of war, the lack of a truly independent party or a pristine / secured crime scene ...
EDIT: a confession by the guilty would also count of course, as unlikely as that is to be forthcoming
www.zerohedge.com
Sign up with Google