ForceFate
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 41,141
Are you losing track of your own posts?Yes and?
Are you losing track of your own posts?Yes and?
how so? seriously?You seem a bit upset?
you mean the allegations made by Ukraine? yeah Ukraine's propaganda does not upset me at all, I trust Ukraine's word as much as Jacob Zuma'sInteresting that the destruction of cities and murder of civilians doesn't seem to evoke such passion from you?
"perceived"? that's quite disingenuous, you can clearly see a deliberate misinterpretation in the press by simply comparing it to the actual textPerceived misinterpretation of good 'ol Uncle Vlad and the f-bomb comes flying out.
No I said that next to Poland Ukraine can brag about being the country that killed the second most Jews.
Many Poles unfortunately did collaborate
According to historian Gunnar S. Paulsson, in occupied Warsaw (a city of 1.3 million, including 350,000 Jews before the war), some 3,000 to 4,000 Poles acted as blackmailers and informants (szmalcowniks) who turned in Jews and fellow-Poles who provided assistance to Jews.[72] Grzegorz Berendt estimates the number of Polish citizens who participated in anti-Jewish actions as being a "group of dozens of thousands of individuals"
Yet the article, which referred to “the greatest massacre in the world’s history”, was published on the fifth page of a six-page issue. And it got no traction elsewhere.
Blair reports that when the Telegraph’s story appeared, Zygielbojm’s wife, Manya, and their son, Tuvia, were prisoners in the Warsaw ghetto. Both died during the razing of the ghetto in 1943.
As for Zygielbojm, he was dismayed at the public indifference to his detailed and chilling revelation of mass murder. And, crushed also by his family’s fate, he took his own life on 11 May 1943. He wrote:
“The responsibility for the crime of the murder of the whole Jewish nationality in Poland rests first of all on those who are carrying it out.
But indirectly it falls also upon the whole of humanity, on the peoples of the Allied nations and on their governments, who up to this day have not taken any real steps to halt this crime.
By looking on passively upon this murder of defenceless millions of tortured children, women and men they have become partners to the responsibility”.
and their current government wants to downplay their role.
So did many french for what it's worth. Finland also joined the Nazis in their fight against the USSR.
The difference though is that Ukraine has a Nazi movement that believes in its WW2 traditions and never went through denazification.
I remind you that according to the Third Decree of the General Governor's concerning the residential restrictions in the General Government of 10/15/1941 (VBL; abbreviation for Verordnungsblatt Generalgouvernement, p. 595) not only Jews who have left their designated residential area will be punished with death, but the same penalty applies to anyone who knowingly provides refuge (a hiding place) to such Jews. This includes not only the providing of a night's lodging and food, but also any other aid, such as transporting them in vehicles of any sort, through the purchase of Jewish valuables, etc.
Didn't the communist Russians murder about 10 times the amount of people the Nazis killed? Nobody mentioned it just because they were an ally.
So, as a descendant, you are bound to do the same as your ancestors?
South Africa has a national holiday to celebrate the burning of schools. Is it a good thing?
When you live in a country, you speak the language of the country. Are you advocating the French change their language?
The Wolfsangel is not Buddhist. It's German. And not a Nazi symbol.
‘Macron is right’ to want to avoid humiliating Russia, Le Pen and Mélenchon say
In an interview with French broadcaster FranceInfo on Tuesday, Le Pen spoke a phrase rarely heard from her mouth: “The French president is right”. She was referring to Macron’s renewed call on the West to avoid humiliating Russia and its leader Vladimir Putin in a bid to offer Moscow a diplomatic way out of the war in Ukraine.
“The French president is right to try to find the means to stop this war through discussion, so that Ukraine regains its sovereignty, Russian troops leave Ukraine,” Le Pen said, who last month lost to Macron in the second round of the French presidential election. In a televised debate between the two final candidates, Macron shamed Le Pen over Russia, accusing her of being “dependent on Putin” due to loans granted to her party by a Russian bank. During her 2017 presidential run, Le Pen also accepted an invitation to meet Putin in Moscow.
During her time on air with FranceInfo, Le Pen also suggested that Ukraine’s criticism over Macron’s comment was off the mark. “I don’t understand why President [Volodomyr] Zelensky accuses him because he even says himself that the only way out of this is diplomacy”, she said, adding that “when you’re looking for a diplomatic exit, you try to avoid cutting off the communication channels”.
Le Pen then went on to criticise Macron over the French government’s embargo on Russian oil and gas imports. It’s “a stupid and harmful sanction for the French people", she said, noting that “the Russian oil we don’t buy will be sold to others“ anyway, and French energy prices will increase.
'One day Russia will come back to the table'
Mélenchon, who hopes to score the prime minister post via the upcoming legislative elections, also lauded Macron’s stance on how to handle Putin.
“If, three weeks from now, I’m put in charge of taking care of this country together with him, it might be better if I don’t immediately provoke any incidents.“ He added that he didn’t think “the Ukrainians should talk to us like that“, since France "supports" Ukraine and is "providing it with arms".
"If President Macron is talking with Mr. Putin, I think he’s right to do so," he said, "because we must not let this man lock himself into a corner. But it would be naive to believe that by talking to him, we will make him leave Ukraine“.
You can never debunk an imbecile ... as proven numerous times in this very thread.
I never denied Stalin's crimes.
Trying to get that old merry go round of Bandera - Nazis - symbols going again.
So boringly predictable.
Also refuses to acknowledge that the USSR was, incredible as it seems, worse than the Nazis for some of occupied Europe during WWII.
Btw, came across an incredible estimation that in the history of the Soviet Union the Soviet State murdered probably 61,911,000 people, 54,769,000 of them citizens. (RJ Rummel).
Makes the Nazis look like pissants (albeit heinous and 2nd only to them) by comparison.
www.polygraph.info
![]()
‘Macron is right’ to want to avoid humiliating Russia, Le Pen and Mélenchon say
French President Emmanuel Macron last week sparked a tsunami of criticism after reiterating his call on the international community to “avoid humiliating Russia” over Ukraine. But three days ahead of…www.france24.com
You seem a bit upset?
Interesting that the destruction of cities and murder of civilians doesn't seem to evoke such passion from you?
Perceived misinterpretation of good 'ol Uncle Vlad and the f-bomb comes flying out.
you mean the allegations made by Ukraine? yeah Ukraine's propaganda does not upset me at all, I trust Ukraine's word as much as Jacob Zuma's
But you never mention them either. You only mention the Nazi crimes because they suit the Ukraine = Nazi propaganda of Putin yearning for Stalins glory days of the USSR.
According to NYU professor and Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen, half of Russia looks back to Joseph Stalin as a great leader and the other half as a genocidal murderer. This disconnect, and a longing for a stronger, more secure state, can be seen in the public debate over a memorial to the victims of the gulag, where more people died than in Hitler’s death camps.
It is in this heated context that Cohen tells the story of the victims and their struggle to reenter society in his new book, The Victims Return: Survivors of the Gulag After Stalin. The result of more than 30 years of research and personal experience, the work is a memoir as much as it is a history, and Cohen joins Laura in the studio to discuss the book and the ongoing struggle to reconcile the troubled period of Stalin’s rule in Russian history.