Nicodeamus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2006
- Messages
- 14,477
No matter the amount of whataboutism you employ, my point remains.
Putin has to be removed from office for Russia to save face & exit.
you're obviously unfamiliar with Russian history, Stalin replaced Lenin and killed more people in a single day than the Tsar did in his entire reign of tyranny.
Putin is a former KGB office, if there is going to be a coup, except an even darker figure to grab power.
Also Yeltsin put more Journalists in jail than Putin and it's not even clear if it is him doing the killing as the Mafia is rampart in Russia.
About Russian journalists, there is, however, a significant, overlooked statistic. According to the American Committee to Protect Journalists, as of 2012, 77 had been murdered—41 during the Yeltsin years, 36 under Putin. By 2018, the total was 82—41 under Yeltsin, the same under Putin. This strongly suggests that the still–partially corrupt post-Soviet economic system, not Yeltsin or Putin personally, led to the killing of so many journalists after 1991, most of them investigative reporters. The former wife of one journalist thought to have been poisoned concludes as much: “Many Western analysts place the responsibility for these crimes on Putin. But the cause is more likely the system of mutual responsibility and the culture of impunity that began to form before Putin, in the late 1990s.”
Who Putin Is Not
Falsely demonizing Russia’s leader has made the new Cold War even more dangerous.
www.thenation.com
Also on the laughable claim that he is a Nazi. Putin is however a Russian nationalist with a too big ego.
§ More recently, there is yet another allegation: Putin is a fascist and white supremacist. The accusation is made mostly, it seems, by people wishing to deflect attention from the role being played by neo-Nazis in US-backed Ukraine. Putin no doubt regards it as a blood slur, and even on the surface it is, to be exceedingly charitable, entirely uninformed. How else to explain Senator Ron Wyden’s solemn warnings, at a hearing on November 1, 2017, about “the current fascist leadership of Russia”? A young scholar recently dismantled a senior Yale professor’s nearly inexplicable propounding of this thesis. My own approach is compatible, though different.
Whatever Putin’s failings, the “fascist” allegation is absurd. Nothing in his statements over nearly 20 years in power are akin to fascism, whose core belief is a cult of blood based on the asserted superiority of one ethnicity over all others. As head of a vast multiethnic state—embracing scores of diverse groups with a broad range of skin colors—such utterances or related acts by Putin would be inconceivable, if not political suicide. This is why he endlessly appeals for harmony in “our entire multi-ethnic nation” with its “multi-ethnic culture,” as he did once again in his re-inauguration speech in 2018.
