Russo-Ukrainian War - 2022 Edition - Part 4

[Nicodeamus]

Yeah, but when they're so obvious, nobody is going to attack them thinking they're the real thing? You don't have much strategic thinking, do you Nico?

maybe that is a tactic? who knows... there are lots of decoys all around and I would bet that not a lot of thinking goes into all of them.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

Wasn't it a common SADF tactic too, although the SADF used mostly wooden/metal models.

I have never seen an SA decoy. The SA war used a blitskrieg strategy and decoys are notoriously slow.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

erm Yanukovych was ousted in a coup d'état.

Four Years of Ukraine and the Myths of Maidan

The history of the Ukrainian crisis, which has made everything it affected worse, is distorted by political myths and American media malpractice.

www.thenation.com

Same old shyte that has been debunked how many times now Nico? You need to shred the debunked stuff the Kremlin sends you.

 

[ForceFate]

Your body has a natural mechanism to repair its DNA. It's not a big concern.
The biggest question is cancer, thyroid cancer in particular.

The irreversible DNA damage occurs at enormously high dosages..

It's true that the body can repair itself to some extend. However, extensive radiation damage can result in various types of cancers and other conditions.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

View attachment 1369091

I pointed out how ridiculous his contrarian views are, like I said I would. If you have no idea of military strategy, don't pick up the stompies thinking you have a point.

 

[Paulsie]

satellite imagery could also help determine where the shelling came from and what may have caused the incident.

Great point. So many accusations of shelling, yet no images
Why??

 

[Nicodeamus]

It's true that the body can repair itself to some extend. However, extensive radiation damage can result in various types of cancers and other conditions.

The risk at low dose radiation is tiny, radiotherapy easily exceed the dosage that is considered "safe" often by a factor of 100.

Can we abolish the 60-year-old international consensus that connects nuclear radiation to cancer

This site contains articles and papers that explore the depth and breadth of all types of energy.

www.allaboutenergy.net

 

[Wut]

I have never seen an SA decoy. The SA war used a blitskrieg strategy and decoys are notoriously slow.

I remember a few Mirage F1 decoys as a kid. I used to play on one that was brought back from the border.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

Those tests are not very difficult to pass,
Militaries recruit from young men who don't have a lot of life experience. It's easy to manipulate them.

You have never sat those tests. How would you know their level of difficulty? Liar. Again.

 

[Dave]

Russia only has 1 warm water port at guess where? Sevastopol Crimea.

That's not Russian, bonebrain.

What about Murmansk? Kaliningrad? Sochi? Novorossiysk? Nakhodka?

 

[Cosmik Debris]

Your body has a natural mechanism to repair its DNA. It's not a big concern.
The biggest question is cancer, thyroid cancer in particular.

The irreversible DNA damage occurs at enormously high dosages..

Of course Nico. You know far better than medical professionals that radiation is not dangerous to DNA. Liar. Again.

 

[Nicodeamus]

Of course Nico. You know far better than medical professionals that radiation is not dangerous to DNA. Liar. Again.

I quoted your the medical professionals and cancer researches that questioned the LNT model. I am only showing what they are showing.

 

[Dave]

Because Yanukovych called it that? He was ousted in a legitimate parly process.

He's been shown that numerous times, he doesn't seem to have the ability to comprehend the actual facts.

Maybe it's because Grayzone hasn't posted it.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

maybe that is a tactic? who knows... there are lots of decoys all around and I would bet that not a lot of thinking goes into all of them.

Great military tactic that. Put up decoys the enemy knows are decoys so that the enemy doesn't attack them.

You're lucky you never sat the tests to join any military Nico. You would have been the tea time discussion by giggling medical staff.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

The risk at low dose radiation is tiny, radiotherapy easily exceed the dosage that is considered "safe" often by a factor of 100.

Can we abolish the 60-year-old international consensus that connects nuclear radiation to cancer

This site contains articles and papers that explore the depth and breadth of all types of energy.

www.allaboutenergy.net

So why aren't you living in a high radiation area then Nico? Try Sellafield in the UK.

Sellafield is the largest nuclear site in Europe and the most complicated nuclear site in the world. By its own admission, it is home to one of the largest inventories of untreated waste ...

Inside Sellafield: how the UK's most dangerous nuclear site is cleaning up its act

Nuclear waste processing site in Cumbria is home to hundreds of tonnes of radioactive waste, but the government wants it to clean up its act

www.wired.co.uk

 

[Nicodeamus]

You have never sat those tests. How would you know their level of difficulty? Liar. Again.

I looked into IQ tests years ago, the US miltiary used them extensively. Generally speaking results from 1 test correlates with another.

All military recruits must take the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) to qualify for enlistment. The ASVAB is essentially an IQ test (correlation = 0.8). The ASVAB predicts SAT scores (correlation = .82). And it correlates with ACT scores (0.77).

To qualify, recruits must score higher than roughly one-third of all who take the ASVAB. The lowest acceptable percentile score to join is 36 for the Air Force, 35 for the Navy, 32 for the Marine Corps, and 31 for the Army.


By definition, the worst test taker who makes it into the military still scores higher than one-third of his or her peers. The military intentionally slices off the bottom third of test-takers, not allowing them to join.

Moral quandaries aside, this means that the military selects for the upper two-thirds of ASVAB test takers. Another study found that among those who finish high school, about 1 in 4 (23%) people do not attain the minimum ASVAB score to join any branch of the military.

Essentially the US military targets the upper 70% of the IQ spectrum, it's above average, but nothing substantial.

Who Serves in the U.S. Military? The Demographics of Enlisted Troops and Officers

Interactive U.S. map of troop representation levels Who serves in the active-duty ranks of the U.S. all-volunteer military? Conventional wisdom holds that military service disproportionately attracts minorities and men and women from disadvantaged backgrounds. Many believe that troops enlist...

www.heritage.org

More evidence of the quality of America's enlisted forces comes from the standardized Armed Forces Qualifying Test (AFQT) that the military administers to all recruits. Over two-thirds of enlisted recruits scored above the 50th percentile on the AFQT. The military tightly restricts how many recruits it accepts with scores below the 30th percentile, and only 2.3 percent of recruits in 2007 scored between the 21st and 30th percentiles (Category IVA; see Chart 3). The military does not accept any recruits in the bottom 20 percent.

 

[vaakseun]

Great point. So many accusations of shelling, yet no images
Why??

I would hazard a guess that Ukraine hasn't actually shelled the reactors then?

 

[Wut]

I have never seen an SA decoy. The SA war used a blitskrieg strategy and decoys are notoriously slow.

Example SAAF decoy.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

I remember a few Mirage F1 decoys as a kid. I used to play on one that was brought back from the border.

Thanks. But I bet that idea got killed fast with the UV in SA causing rapid deterioration.

 

[Nicodeamus]

So why aren't you living in a high radiation area then Nico? Try Sellafield in the UK.

Sellafield is the largest nuclear site in Europe and the most complicated nuclear site in the world. By its own admission, it is home to one of the largest inventories of untreated waste ...

Inside Sellafield: how the UK's most dangerous nuclear site is cleaning up its act

Nuclear waste processing site in Cumbria is home to hundreds of tonnes of radioactive waste, but the government wants it to clean up its act

www.wired.co.uk

High waste areas doesn't have a lot of working opportunities? I have worked however on Cigeo in France and been to LaHarve (where they store the high end waste)