He, she or it does seem to only tweet pro-Russo propaganda, but then the ones posted here as "evidence" of Ukraine winning are also swallowing canned western views of the war. Putin was wrong to start the war he was never going to win and he's caused a lot of hardship for the world with that. The west's response has been disproportionate with ewc of people's **** because they may be allied with Russia. Banning of sports people for expressing sympathy with Russia, etc. All very hypocritical when they before this let a lot of worse **** slide.
I don't think many people here seriously think Ukraine is "winning" in the traditional sense. Winning in this context is a war of attrition that tries to make sure that any Russian gains are achieved with the maximum payment in terms of men and equipment. The idea isn't to beat the Russians, it's to make the cost of continuing the war too high.
Nico however seems to think that Ukraine should somehow have avoided fighting at all, that the mere fact of them resisting an invading army is somehow immoral. Most pro-Ukraine people here accept that Ukraine is not perfect, that some of their nazis are very problematic but that existence of those problems doesn't change that supporting them over Russia is clearly the correct moral choice. I think Nico has called Putin unstable and a dictator but the vast majority of articles that he posts here follow the Russian line of thinking, they blame the war on NATO provocation, perpetuate the BS about the supposed coup in 2014, and does everything possible to deflect responsibility for this war from the only country that deserves it, Russia.