Russo-Ukrainian War - 2022 Edition - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153
Shame .... Ukraine is still going to loose the war which your funny little NATO wanted ( and now sponsoring ) for years.

NATO is not a political entity. It cannot declare war. Only the governments that are members of NATO can declare war. The governments that are members of NATO are sponsoring the war. NATO only complies with their government's instructions.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153
There was a team. Office workers were blocked from some floors a few days before. I watched a doccie on the whole 9/11 about 6 months after. You see the timed explosions as the building is coming down, also the building fell in freefall. All other building in the past hit by planes burned upwards, the building underneath the impact was fine. There was a CCTV clip of a missile/rocket hitting the pentagon before all the footage was confiscated. Care to try find any cctv coverage of pentagon being hit? I wish I downloaded it before it was taken down.

9/11 was an inside job.

Hahahaha! Evidence for this tripe? You're a civil engineer?
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153
Whataboutism = hypocrasy.

No, its the logical fallacy of an appeal to hypocrisy:

Whataboutism means you avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.

This logical fallacy is also known as the appeal to hypocrisy. It is commonly employed as an effective red herring because it takes the heat off someone having to defend their argument, and instead shifts the focus back onto the person making the criticism.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153
Not entirely true either. Any bridge/road/rail can then be designated a strategic military target once it transports event a single soldier or piece of military equipment. Don't come with your ridiculous arguments that try and warped what is actually agreed to as part of the rules of engagement, which by the way are different from country to country.

Exactly. The bridge was being used as the main military supply route to Crimea and the southern annexed territories. So it was a legitimate military target. How else was the military equipment getting to Crimea?

What rules of engagement are you speaking of? Rules of engagement apply to the military they're issued to, not to a war. Did you ever serve in a military? Evidently not.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153
Are you perhaps mixing up the use of cluster munitions with carpet bombing?

The US last engaged in carpet Bombing in Vietnam, before it was banned in 1977 by the Geneva convention.

And it was used on the jungle, not on civilian cities.
 

Cius

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
8,347
Strongly suspect that Putin has a limited supply of missiles and due to sanctions won't be getting parts to make more. Spending millions and his strategic reserve for what? Its not like it will in any way change the resolve of the Ukrainians and it only re-enforces the West's idea of Russia as the Villain. Very little accomplished that is good for Russia with these missiles. Seems to only be making things worse for Russia so why fire them?
 

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,916
Strongly suspect that Putin has a limited supply of missiles and due to sanctions won't be getting parts to make more. Spending millions and his strategic reserve for what? Its not like it will in any way change the resolve of the Ukrainians and it only re-enforces the West's idea of Russia as the Villain. Very little accomplished that is good for Russia with these missiles. Seems to only be making things worse for Russia so why fire them?

Desperation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top