Meh. You were celebrating the killing of civilians and the bombing of an civilian bridge just a few days ago.
Russians celebrated the attacks on civilians in Ukraine.
Are these civilian vehicles on the bridge?Meh. You were celebrating the killing of civilians and the bombing of an civilian bridge just a few days ago.
Ukrain has killed countless civilians when they shell cities in Dunbass.
Funny how people complain when Russia finally fights back. (Even though still very limited.)
I'm not having this silly argument with you. There's no way you can justify the ISIS style car bomb.Are these civilian vehicles on the bridge?
![]()
Your attempt to both sides this is laughable, considering how Ukraine attacked the bridge late at night when traffic was at a minimum, versus Russia attacking Kyiv at rush hour, with multiple cruise missiles that targeted civilian sites directly.I'm not having this silly argument with you. There's no way you can justify the ISIS style car bomb.
I just pointed out that people only selectively care about civilians when it is convenient.
They already are facing most of NATO. Just not the full airforce. I highly doubt Western countries have the apatite to see their airplanes be blown out of the sky.
No one had strong feelings about Russia and Russians before they invaded Ukraine
2 maybe 3 civilians deaths are still civilian deaths. The terrorist nature of the attack is particularly disgusting.Your attempt to both sides this is laughable, considering how Ukraine attacked the bridge late at night when traffic was at a minimum, versus Russia attacking Kyiv at rush hour, with multiple cruise missiles that targeted civilian sites directly.
The bridge was a legitimate military target, civilian deaths should always be avoided where possible but if you take the position that you can never put civilians in danger during war you play into the hands of your foe who could simply protect any military asset by placing civilians near it.2 maybe 3 civilians deaths are still civilian deaths. The terrorist nature of the attack is particularly disgusting.
I disagree with your assessment.They're facing NATOs excess arms used by the Ukraine military.
NATO itself has millions of well rested combat ready troops and tonnes of arms including ships, tanks, planes etc. that are waiting just behind border lines ready for their orders.
Russias war with Ukraine has already gone on too long, NATO has had way too much time to manufacture, train and collaborate and is why they supporting Ukraine the longer this drags on the weaker Russia gets and the stronger NATO does.
NATO is acting out The Art of War I guess.
Russia says exactly the same about everything they bombed just because you see some swings in the background doesn't make it so.The bridge was a legitimate military target, civilian deaths should always be avoided where possible but if you take the position that you can never put civilians in danger during war you play into the hands of your foe who could simply protect any military asset by placing civilians near it.
Tell me how the child's playground in Kyiv was a legitimate military target?
And you believe them? The bridge is clearly a militry target, what was the military target there where attacking in the middle of Kyiv, a city hundreds of miles behind the front lines of this conflict?Russia says exactly the same about everything they bombed just because you see some swings in the background doesn't make it so.
Are you senile?Nope. All pipelines are out of action and NS2 is incomplete anyway. Unless you have gone down and can say otherwise.
And they're itching for it - as per your comment.Poland will absolutely and resolutely smash Russia if they were provoked.
You are contradicting yourself is you don't believe anything away from the front line could be a military target. I suggest you get on Google maps and look at were the bridge is.And you believe them? The bridge is clearly a militry target, what was the military target there where attacking in the middle of Kyiv, a city hundreds of miles behind the front lines of this conflict?
Russia says they hit all targets that they targeted. So they actually did target the playground.Russia says exactly the same about everything they bombed just because you see some swings in the background doesn't make it so.
Neither of us know the planned projectory of any particular missile. Trying to claim Russia actually targeted a playground is silly
Poland is certainly a wierd case. Playing both sides demanding reparations for ww2.And they're itching for it - as per your comment.