I certainly don't want them to be involved as everything they do is to their advantage and the detriment of others.
Certainly nobody does that but sometimes one can't expect the US to do things for free. There is no free lunch. There is always a choice and America is
often the best choice. It's not a choice among true independence and domination by US, or Russia or France/Germany, etc but domination by the US, domination by France/Germany or France/Germany/Russia. The suggestion that it's best to get rid of the US and Russian influence won't help because that opens up central/eastern Europe to domination by France-Germany, and they have have economic benefits from cozing up to Russia. Former Eastern Europe is still weak economically and divided and can't play off France/Germany as equals. Hence alliances have to be forged with those who would not want France/Germany and Russia to dominate Europe too much, namely the "Anglo-Saxons". I say too much, because there are always different streams in various nations and various interests. US would prefer that France and Germany even dominated Europe but they listened to them, these two however are reluctant to do that. Domination by the US is not the best but is the most palatable. And usually comes in the form of soft power but as you know with Russia soft power can turn into full on special operation at any stage.
Great Britain's foreign policy has always been to keep Europe such that no single power can consolidate Europe under itself since even before the days of Napoleon. To that end, to a certain degree the Brits will support former Eastern Europe because those countries will remain relatively weak for many decades (if not longer) and do not pose a threat to them but make Europe more balanced, which is to the UK's advantage. The French on the other hand want to compete with UK/US and so need acknowledgement from Russia and their co-operation and friendship and would possibly sell out Eastern Europe to gain influence. As this allows for Russian domination and influence in Europe that won't do for us. Alas as said a perfect situation where we're all equals and everyone respects each other does not exist.
The struggle Ukraine is facing is also a struggle for continued freedom from Russian influence and threats in former Eastern Europe. People who bring up Bandera don't understand this. Yes there is some percentage of Ukrainians who like Bandera despite the OUN/UPA's murderous ways and there are talks going on about that, but Ukraine does not pose a threat, it's not a Banderite country and hopefully the goodwill gained by Europe helping them will be reciprocated and they will learn to accept that some of their former leaders during WW2 were not the best of people. In addition they need help and deserve help because people in need on one's doorstep should be helped the soonest, and one can't blame them for some atrocities committed by only a small portion of their movements in the 30s/40s. You build friendship by helping people who are in need. Children who fled Ukraine as refugees will be harder to convert into genuine Banderites because they will remember the help they received in childhood and no amount of BS will change what you internalise as a child. When this war ends there will be serious talks with Ukraine over some aspects of their history and who some of their people see as heroes.
On the other hand given Russia where Joe Stalin still enjoys a high approval rating in a country with nukes and huge population and economic resources such nostalgia is more dangerous than one for UPA.