Cosmik Debris
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
- Messages
- 35,153
I did cover that.
Where? Do you ever read the unread posts before parachuting in to troll the thread?
I did cover that.
I am guilty of this.This.
I am actually also getting annoyed at those that respond to the trolls. They are part of the problem as they keep on feeding them. (and naturally the trolls respond back with more trolling). So there is no hope of changing their minds.. Hence I think those trolling the trolls can also be classified as trolls.
I so wish for a setting on the forum where if you Ignore someone, then you also automatically Ignore any replies to those people. Thus even if someone is not on my ignore list, I don't want to see any posts where they reply to someone who is on the list.
It will be Russian soil now.
And wrong about what? That the west and Ukraine threatened Russia and Russian speaking people in what used to be Ukraine. Even if 100% of Russians die that is still true, it is even more true the more they die. Don't know how Putin can be wrong considering the bigger picture. You could argue they should have sacrificed the people of the Dunbass and defend on Russia's current border, but it's the same problem.
The real world isn't call of duty were you just run around killing everyone.
Why did the US fail in the middle east? They didn't have local support. As easy as that. You cannot hold territory without local support.
It wasn't IEC but South African observers.Yeah, our IEC that verified the Zimbabwean elections free and fair when Mugabe won last time...
Putin has a DEVASTATING plan that's unfolding as we speak | Redacted with Natali and Clayton Morris
NB goes out of his way to consciously ignore or dismiss conspicuous evidence, obfuscate and propagate half truths and outright lies. It shows me he knows the truth or there's more than meets the eye.I am guilty of this.
In a way I do feel that sometimes it is necessary to engage, to shine a light on their beliefs, to push them to inadvertently expose their true beliefs, as many of them hide behind a faux neutrality facade.
An example was how I had NarrowBand claim that a country joining NATO meant that NATO had annexed them, in the same way Russia had annexed Crimea etc. It showed how biased and warped his world view is. I feel had we ignored his statements, we would have missed that insight into how his bias drives his posts.
However, I take your point and agree. I will ignore the more belligerent trolls, with their overt attempts to sow discord and bedlam in these forums.
Thanks for giving me cause, to pause for some reflection.
Lol man. Every single country. Name one that was a success.Failed in the Middle East? Where?
The overran them militarily first before setting up the puppet government.
I would not put doing something so stupid past the CIA or someone in the US, but it really does just help Russia.
Russia struggled between deciding how much money they still wanted to make selling gas to Europe vs shutting down the gas.
That's now decided by a forced shutdown
But that is what Riettie was saying.All of those came into effect after the Nazis had won militarily.
Many of them came into effect to prevent further bloodshed, for example, the Dutch. After the bombing of Rotterdam, the Dutch decided there was no point in resistance If they continued to fight, more cities would have been levelled and the Nazis would still have won.
The French, they were war-shy after WW1. They had no stomach for it and after they were outflanked in the Ardennes, they had no feasible strategy to hold the Germans back. All it would have led to was further losses and destruction of French cities and no chance of victory.
They didn't have local support. As easy as that. You cannot hold territory without local support.
See, kids, it was "in no-one's interest"... No-one had a reason to do this. It was just a random act of sabotage that required specialist underwater operations and explosives. Your everyday thugs.y.