Russo-Ukrainian War - 2022 Edition - Part 6

Status
Not open for further replies.

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,141
Russia is a corrupt communist infested cancer that needs to be wiped off the planet. Ukraine is a corrupt nazi infested cancer that needs to be wiped off the planet. Mark my words, when the russians are gone and the western 'aid' cheques stop coming and zelenskys usefulness has ended, azov and co will take control of ukraine, either by force wiping out and assassinating everyone standing in their way, or just handed over to them by zelensky under threat of death... they now have the money and arms to do it thanks to the west. Ukraine will be a nazi controlled dystopian hell in the years to come
You spend too much time on Rus QAnon.
 

AfricanTech

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
40,369

South Africa and Russia have much in common ...........I can see why some folks in SA identify with Russia. :(

Cripes!

Didn't realise it was THAT bad.

These bastids literally letting everything fall into ruin.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153
I have also heard of other atrocities done by the Ukraine to russian soldiers , like chopping of genitalia. That one I will not try to find a source. I pity the Ukraine POW's to come.

This one?

HORRIFYING footage has emerged showing cruel Russian soldiers castrating a Ukrainian prisoner with a box-cutter, Kyiv claims. The sickening clip appears to show a group of men in Russian camouflage…

 

Blu82

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
6,275
This one?

HORRIFYING footage has emerged showing cruel Russian soldiers castrating a Ukrainian prisoner with a box-cutter, Kyiv claims. The sickening clip appears to show a group of men in Russian camouflage…

Didn't OSINT track down that Russian unit and it then ceased to exist?
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153

That's the one.

Are you aware that the misuse of the surrender protocol in order to attack the enemy is a war crime under the Geneva Convention?

False surrender. False surrender is a type of perfidy in the context of war. It is a war crime under Protocol I of the Geneva Convention. False surrenders are usually used to draw the enemy out of cover to attack them off guard

 

AfricanTech

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
40,369
Are you aware that the misuse of the surrender protocol in order to attack the enemy is a war crime under the Geneva Convention?

False surrender. False surrender is a type of perfidy in the context of war. It is a war crime under Protocol I of the Geneva Convention. False surrenders are usually used to draw the enemy out of cover to attack them off guard


These morons are aware of nothing.
 

WhosThis

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2022
Messages
550
Cripes!

Didn't realise it was THAT bad.

These bastids literally letting everything fall into ruin.
So, when our soldiers laid down arms in a conflict zone to go on strike for wages, while in active war was not an indication that our army is completely and utterly useless?

What about the time the village they were stationed to protect came under fire, and all our soldiers ran away and watched the civilians get slaughtered with pangas?

Or the time they almost drove over their ranking officer during a demonstration?
The mere fact that the army is allowed the strike should speak for itself.
 

Mirai

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 21, 2017
Messages
11,243

That's the one.

I have also heard of other atrocities done by the Ukraine to russian soldiers , like chopping of genitalia. That one I will not try to find a source. I pity the Ukraine POW's to come.

The one where people have to make split second decisions to shoot of not to shoot or else they'll die?

I wonder how you'd react? War isn't some sort of pseudo-intellectual ballet appreciation. Soldiers kill each other in war, and when you're shot at there's often no time to play Hollywood policeman. Nobody wants to die.

The Russians surrendered and then one of them opened fire seriously wounding a UA soldier. The others responded. They had a right to fear for their lives and shoot. The men on the ground could have been in on it or they could have been shot in the crossfire.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,153
So, when our soldiers laid down arms in a conflict zone to go on strike for wages, while in active war was not an indication that our army is completely and utterly useless?

What about the time the village they were stationed to protect came under fire, and all our soldiers ran away and watched the civilians get slaughtered with pangas?

Or the time they almost drove over their ranking officer during a demonstration?
The mere fact that the army is allowed the strike should speak for itself.

The SANDF is not allowed to strike if that is the "our soldiers" you are referring to. It has never been on strike either. The SANDF has a union as do many other Western militaries like the Dutch and that is purely for collective bargaining as collective grievances are not allowed in a military as it is tantamount to mutiny.

Care to link some sources so we know what you are on about and it's not just hearsay?
 

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,141
So, when our soldiers laid down arms in a conflict zone to go on strike for wages, while in active war was not an indication that our army is completely and utterly useless?

What about the time the village they were stationed to protect came under fire, and all our soldiers ran away and watched the civilians get slaughtered with pangas?

Or the time they almost drove over their ranking officer during a demonstration?
The mere fact that the army is allowed the strike should speak for itself.
Citation? I don't recall SANDF laying down arms because of pay dispute. Strike? A bunch of them who got involved in strike action were kicked out of the military.

Village? Run? Cite your sources please.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,505
So, when our soldiers laid down arms in a conflict zone to go on strike for wages, while in active war was not an indication that our army is completely and utterly useless?

What about the time the village they were stationed to protect came under fire, and all our soldiers ran away and watched the civilians get slaughtered with pangas?

Or the time they almost drove over their ranking officer during a demonstration?
The mere fact that the army is allowed the strike should speak for itself.
Yeah provide a source for that horseshyte claim...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top