Russo-Ukrainian War - 2022 Edition - Part 6

Status
Not open for further replies.

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,726
seems @Dave has resorted to nonsense animal memes to outright lie

good luck with that, is it some sort of entry requirement to your nonsense OSINT club?

:ROFL:
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,726
Nah. Not even going to debate it with the scum lovers. Not worth the time or trouble. All they do is bring up old **** time and time again. The last few topics have been rehashed by them more than a few times in the threads
perhaps it's brought up time and again because you lot keep repeating a lie time and again ... ever considered if you stop lying nobody would need to bring it up?

:cool:
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,098
your second nonsense source quotes some random dumbass from Estonia, again, the official Russian plan can only come from official Russian sources ... there is NO SUCH SOURCE that says any bullcrap about 3 or 5 days or any timeframe for that matter

Here you go:

A Russian state-run news agency prematurely published an article that said Russia has taken back Ukraine.

"Ukraine has returned to Russia," said the article, which ran on RIA Novosti and has since been taken down. "The West sees the return of Russia to its historical borders in Europe."

A copy of the original RIA Novosti article can be seen on the WayBack Machine, a tool that documents changes across websites over time. The article had an 8AM timestamp and was scheduled to run on February 26, according to the archive.



 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,726
Here you go:

A Russian state-run news agency prematurely published an article that said Russia has taken back Ukraine.

"Ukraine has returned to Russia," said the article, which ran on RIA Novosti and has since been taken down. "The West sees the return of Russia to its historical borders in Europe."

A copy of the original RIA Novosti article can be seen on the WayBack Machine, a tool that documents changes across websites over time. The article had an 8AM timestamp and was scheduled to run on February 26, according to the archive.



RIA Novosti bragging about some outcome prematurely is not the Russian government publishing their plan

Nexta is Ukraine's propaganda outlet ... seriously wtaf are you even thinking quoting that bullcrap?!?

Lukashenko is the president of Belarus ... notice how I didn't say "Russia"? ... yeah, LMFAO
 

vaakseun

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
1,976
ironically in this case that statement would be true, the 3 days bullshyte has been debunked, there is literally no official Russian government source whatsoever after the war began that says anything about 3 days, that is just a simple fact

The troops that were supposed to take Kyiv were only issued with enough rations and fuel for three days. The rest of their luggage consisted of parade uniforms.

This was corroborated by CCTV footage of widespread looting of supermarkets and convenience stores (and even chicken coops) as well as the statements by RU POW's that were intervieved.

Statements by Russian officials are pointless because when Russia speaks, Russia lies.

Funny, this actually reminds me, there was a guy on here who fancied himself some kind of military strategist. Full of it, repeatedly proclaimed Ukraine's Kherson offensive was over less than a week after it started. :ROFL:

Got laughed off this forum, what a complete dolt! :ROFL::laugh::ROFL::laugh::ROFL::laugh::ROFL:

el-risitas-juan-joya-borja.gif
 
Last edited:

Wut

Executive Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
5,816
Nowhere does the US curtail sanctions offences to just cargo.

Here's a rather convoluted explanation, basically the US doesn't restrict action unless restricted specifically by US law:

However, despite the U.S’s ratification of the 1958 Convention, courts considering it must still confront whether the relevant treaty provisions are “self-executing.” This distinction, which has perennially fuzzy edges, is instrumental to determining whether courts have jurisdiction to hear treaty law claims. Self-executing treaty provisions are those that can operate without implementing legislation. U.S. courts generally regard such provisions as equivalent to federal statutes when the treaty clearly authorizes executive action in “pursuance of its provisions” and where existing legislation is adequate to enforce the treaty provision.

Provisions that are not self-executing may create international commitments but are not binding federal law absent associated implementing legislation. The vast majority of treaty provisions are non-self-executing.

U.S. courts maintain that their jurisdictional bounds are exclusively constitutional or statutory and that customary international law is insufficient to restrict their authority on the high seas absent Congress explicitly abdicating jurisdiction.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit tackled self-execution of 1958 Convention Article 6—curtailing jurisdiction over foreign vessels in international waters—in United States v. Postal, which involved a drug-runner seized in the southern Caribbean. The Postal court found Article 6 not to be self-executing and therefore that it could not restrict the jurisdiction of U.S. courts.
So what law is the yacht breaking that warrants interception by the US Navy then?

Also a note from Cupcake's link regarding the drug interception of the Belize vessel:

Because Defense personnel are prohibited from directly engaging in law enforcement activities, the ship had on it a Coast Guard law enforcement detachment.
 
Last edited:

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,726
The troops that were supposed to take Kyiv were only issued with only enough rations and fuel for three days. The rest of their luggage consisted of parade uniforms.
more bullshyte from your media brainwashing btw, cite a single official Russian source stating that and I will gladly admit defeat

This was corroborated by CCTV footage of widespread looting of supermarkets and convenience stores (and even chicken coops) as well as the statements by RU POW's that were intervieved.
LMFAO, yeah that's complete kak, try again

Statements by Russian officials are pointless because when Russia speaks, Russia lies.
so do you it seems ...
 

vaakseun

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
1,976
more bullshyte from your media brainwashing btw, cite a single official Russian source stating that and I will gladly admit defeat


LMFAO, yeah that's complete kak, try again


so do you it seems ...

Why would Russia admit they screwed up? It's like that "Kherson offensive over" guy coming back and admitting what a complete dunce he is.

There are literally dozens of videos showing Russians scrounging for food. It was pretty significant news within the first week of the war.





 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top