If that is what you understood me to say, all I can say is
ai fok Meraai.
You tried debunking the radicals in Ukraine by holding up Zelensky as being Jewish. All I did was showing you what type of Jew he is in reality and why it's a BS argument. The rest is all on you.
In reality what you did was trying to say the ANC in South Africa cannot be racist because they have a Carl Niehaus. Except in Ukrainian context people voted for a Carl Niehaus, an actor, think about that. When he won, he was hijacked by Nazis embedded in the political system as a figurehead. That tells you a lot.
The movement to revise history is strong in you, just like in the Ukraine. Example:
Try find that. Never happened! Yet remnants still remain at
https://www.ohchr.org/
Let's also talk about this total kak you spew, gaslighting who I don't know:
Suddenly, just like you're trying to whitewash Ukrainian radicals to a non-existent status, you're now deliberately whitewashing and making off as non-existent years of strife within the Ukraine between north-western pro-west and south-eastern pro-Russian Ukrainians, trying to rewrite history. Just like farm murders do not exist in South Africa?
You forget why Zelensky was voted in? I guess there was no corruption in Ukraine after Maidan, it was all sorted? Yet then why was "Servants of the People" so popular if not to bring decent politicians to power, end corruption, bring peace to Ukraine. Why would that be needed? Or are you just saying none of it was true and he was just a good actor who deceived the whole Ukraine? His while campaign was based upon peace bringer for the Ukraine.
Except he never told them he would lead them into war to then have to find a peace ...
I'm not sure who you're trying to bs, or just simping for the position of the EFF's new head of revisionist history.
"My Nasis are better than your Nazis" is rapidly becoming "We have no Nazis in the Ukraine, only Russia has".