Russo-Ukrainian War - 2022 Edition - Part 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
Wow, so you think the SU-57 will possibly be a game changed in this war?

For me if they do actively introduce it, it speaks volumes as to just how fscked Russia is, if they're prepared to risk their top flight jet, of which they only have 21 (and 10 of which are test bed vehicles)

If anyone were to use a 5th generation combat fighter jet to fight unarmed civilians it would be Russia.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,136
Theres a link - https://www.furuno.com/en/technology/sonar/basic/view

But even that is old school now, omni where a 360 happens in 1 ping is the newer tech.

Sounds like Navy only likes using passive by what your saying.

No one ping will give 360 due to the propellor wash. Propellor wash appears as clutter. The reason for towed arrays.

According to my former submariner friend, using active sonar in a submarine defeats the entire objective of a submarine - Stealth and gives the position away. Active is used by helicopter sonobuoys in conjunction with a surface vessel's active sonar to prosecute a submarine contact by triangulation. Active sonar is not used as a defensive or patrolling measure. The entire crew cannot sleep because the sound of an active sonar is so loud inside a vessel. Therefore it's used for prosecution only.

Active sonar on search with no target also gives a submarine a perfect location of the surface vessel and firing solution. It will also mask the sound of an approaching torpedo launched by a submarine. So, unless the surface vessel is prosecuting a sub, active sonar is not used.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
I see everybody is still arguing like it is going to change anything. What I find interesting is that soon the SU-57 is going to be fully introduced into the conflict as well as the marker combat drone. Would be interesting to see how that fairs. I don't have much hopes for it as it just seems a little iffy but should it deliver on what is claimed it could be a scary thing to encounter out in the field. Don't know how tough they are though.
Russia has already resorted to flying ballistic arcs to launch stand off long range missiles to kill civilians, so they can keep outside of the range of Ukrainian SAM's.

A handful of poor performing fighter jets won't bring in any new strategic advantages, that their current long range bombers' don't already have.
 

Kaapie

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2021
Messages
612
If you fire a missile intended to kill people and it ends up going astray and killing someone else then the fault is 100% with the person who fired the missile.
FmdYDRbX0AA1ANt


FYI
Gaza.
Not at War.
But not blonde or blue eyed.
 

TEXTILE GUY

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 4, 2012
Messages
16,293
This is an appeal to emotion fallacy. Try harder next time.

The Russian missle was diverted away from it's military target by Ukrainian missile defence systems. The blame is 50/50 here for her death.

Russia attacked UA, not the other way round.

UA must be really good at diverting Russian missiles because this isnt the first and wont be the last of such incidents.

_123502905_irpin_640x2-nc.png
_123503743_kyiv_640x2-nc.png


_123502907_chernihiv_640x2-nc.png



And I am guessing the UN got it wrong too


And I spose HRW got it wrong


And this guy was coerced



Dunno, I am not there and am certainly not the expert in this area.
 

Cray

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
34,549
FmdYDRbX0AA1ANt


FYI
Gaza.
Not at War.
But not blonde or blue eyed.
And your point is? If you want to make a point about how the IDF should be blamed for stuff like that then I'll happily take part, not sure how it's relevant to this discussion though...

And for your information, I have participated in many threads criticizing both sides of that conflict long before you ever came to this forum. So take your snide insinuations about racism and shove it.
 
Last edited:

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
Anyone trying to deny Russia's targeted slaughtering of innocent civilians can go fck themselves right up the ass.

They literally encircled Mariupol, shot anyone trying to escape and then carpet bombed the city.

Fck Russia and fck all of those who support their actions.


On 9 March, Russian planes dropped several bombs on Mariupol maternity hospital number 3, destroying the building. Seventeen people were injured and three died as a result of the airstrike.[55][56]

On 13 March, the Red Cross warned that the siege had become a humanitarian crisis.[57] A month into the conflict, Ukrainian authorities said that about 90% of buildings in Mariupol were damaged or destroyed.[58] An aid worker from the Red Cross described the conditions there as "apocalyptic", with concerns for the humanitarian situation being severe damage to infrastructure, access to sanitation, and food shortages.[59]

On 16 March, the Russian attacking forces dropped a bomb on the Mariupol Drama Theater. The central part of the building was destroyed. At the time of the air strike, civilians and refugees were hiding in the theater's basement. The Neptune Basin building was also destroyed by an air strike.

On 19 March 2022, a Ukrainian police officer in Mariupol made a video in which he said, "Children, elderly people are dying. The city is destroyed and it is wiped off the face of the earth." The video was authenticated by the Associated Press.[60] Russian forces in Mariupol have been accused of human rights violations and war crimes.

By 18 March, Mariupol was completely encircled and fighting reached the city centre, hampering civilian evacuation efforts.[63]

On 20 March, an art school in the city, which was sheltering around 400 people, was destroyed by a Russian bombing.[64] The same day, as Russian forces continued their siege of the city, the Russian government demanded a full surrender, which several Ukrainian government officials refused.[65][66]

On 27 March, Ukraine's deputy prime minister, Olha Stefanishyna, stated that "[Mariupol's inhabitants] don't have access to water, to any food supplies, to anything. More than 85 percent of the whole town is destroyed," and that Russia's objectives have "nothing to do with humanity".[69] In a telephone conversation between Russian President Vladimir Putin and French President Emmanuel Macron on 29 March, Putin stated that bombardment of Mariupol would only end when Ukrainian troops fully surrender Mariupol given the advanced state of devastation in the nearly captured city.[70]

On 11 April 2022, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that Mariupol had been "completely destroyed".[71][72]


a019ef511e5fcce72a598740b126c977


Mariupol-destruction-800x450.jpg


fafcba_1_pszczel_mariupol_cnn.jpg


TASS_51669725.jpg


000_32ma6k6.jpg


Mariupol-01-2.jpg


tag%3Areuters.com%2C2022%3Anewsml_LYNXNPEI2T14N%3A12022-03-30T182739Z_1_LYNXNPEI2T14N_RTROPTP_3_UKRAINE-CRISIS-MARIUPOL.JPG


Before:
089d0000-0a00-0242-bfb6-08da1212c2e3_w1278_s_d2.jpg


After:
089d0000-0a00-0242-ce03-08da120fb418_w1278_s_d2.jpg
 

MiW

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,313
What was that about the West pushing Ukraine into a debt trap? USA help is still free of charge to date and here is the EU loans.


35 years without interest

The government makes clear that €18 billion are not for military expenses. "We have agreed with the EU, and we adhere to it, that their funds go to humanitarian needs, not on financing security and aid," Stefanishyna said. However, whatever the intended purpose, Ukraine receives this debt aid.

Some EU states, primarily Germany, wanted to allocate money to Ukraine as a grant, as the USA did last year. This idea did not find unanimous support. As a compromise, they agreed on extremely favourable conditions which guarantee that the loan of €18 billion will not put Ukraine in a "money pit."


First, the loan repayment period is due within 35 years. The EU has never lent money to Ukraine for such a long time. Last year's macro-financial assistance was for 25 years. It was usually about a 15-year term before the war.

Secondly, Ukraine will have to repay its debt not before 2033, according to EU Council. This is an unprecedentedly long grace period.

Moreover, it is not ruled out that the debt could be written off or the seized funds of the Russian Federation will repay it.

Thirdly, Ukraine will not pay interest and other loan services. The EU made a political decision to avoid the side effects of the "macrofin" for Kyiv. After all, even with preferential interest, debt service of €18 billion is expensive. For this, Brussels came up with the mechanism of "interest subsidy": the interest will be paid by EU countries instead of Ukraine.
 

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,915
What was that about the West pushing Ukraine into a debt trap? USA help is still free of charge to date and here is the EU loans.


35 years without interest

The government makes clear that €18 billion are not for military expenses. "We have agreed with the EU, and we adhere to it, that their funds go to humanitarian needs, not on financing security and aid," Stefanishyna said. However, whatever the intended purpose, Ukraine receives this debt aid.

Some EU states, primarily Germany, wanted to allocate money to Ukraine as a grant, as the USA did last year. This idea did not find unanimous support. As a compromise, they agreed on extremely favourable conditions which guarantee that the loan of €18 billion will not put Ukraine in a "money pit."


First, the loan repayment period is due within 35 years. The EU has never lent money to Ukraine for such a long time. Last year's macro-financial assistance was for 25 years. It was usually about a 15-year term before the war.

Secondly, Ukraine will have to repay its debt not before 2033, according to EU Council. This is an unprecedentedly long grace period.

Moreover, it is not ruled out that the debt could be written off or the seized funds of the Russian Federation will repay it.

Thirdly, Ukraine will not pay interest and other loan services. The EU made a political decision to avoid the side effects of the "macrofin" for Kyiv. After all, even with preferential interest, debt service of €18 billion is expensive. For this, Brussels came up with the mechanism of "interest subsidy": the interest will be paid by EU countries instead of Ukraine.

Fantastic news, Russia will also be contributing many many billions with money the West has appropriated. Thanks Russian orcs.
 

Major Boredom

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
3,134
Anyone trying to deny Russia's targeted slaughtering of innocent civilians can go fck themselves right up the ass.

They literally encircled Mariupol, shot anyone trying to escape and then carpet bombed the city.

Fck Russia and fck all of those who support their actions.


There is a reason why I refer to the russian supporters as russian lover scum
Supporters of the deliberate rape/murder/assault and kidnapping of civilian children/women and men

See we have had a few new ones these last couple of weeks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top