Blu82
Executive Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2005
- Messages
- 6,272
They have an even better response.The Estonian ambassador is probably popping the champagne as we speak.![]()
They have an even better response.The Estonian ambassador is probably popping the champagne as we speak.![]()
What sort of agreement would you propose?Sending more weapons just means the loss of more lives... they need to come to a peaceful agreement that is beneficial to both sides.
Disagree, to ensure long term peace Russian must learn that their aggression have a high cost. They have done this kind of shít to many times..... time for them to learn the hard way.Sending more weapons just means the loss of more lives... they need to come to a peaceful agreement that is beneficial to both sides.
"Peace for Our Time"Sending more weapons just means the loss of more lives... they need to come to a peaceful agreement that is beneficial to both sides.
What Russia wanted a year ago:What sort of agreement would you propose?
What Russia wanted a year ago:
1. Ukraine doesn't enter NATO and maintains a position of neutrality
2. Crimea is recognised as a territory of Russia
3. Independence is granted to the people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk
4. Ukraine demilitarises and surrenders any weapons which constitute a threat to Russia
5. Ukraine goes through a process of denazification, which would essentially constitute a change of government based on Putin's previous words about the Ukrainian leadership.
6. Russian becomes the second official language of Ukraine and any laws which prohibit its use are repealed.
points 4 & 5 could have been negotiated around.
But now not sure, and 3 would now be 'recognised as part of Russia'. Thanks Boris & co.
What Russia wanted a year ago:
1. Ukraine doesn't enter NATO and maintains a position of neutrality
2. Crimea is recognised as a territory of Russia
3. Independence is granted to the people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk
4. Ukraine demilitarises and surrenders any weapons which constitute a threat to Russia
5. Ukraine goes through a process of denazification, which would essentially constitute a change of government based on Putin's previous words about the Ukrainian leadership.
6. Russian becomes the second official language of Ukraine and any laws which prohibit its use are repealed.
points 4 & 5 could have been negotiated around.
But now not sure, and 3 would now be 'recognised as part of Russia'. Thanks Boris & co.
You know, I hope you are getting paid to write the above because I would hate to think that this is what you actually believe is fair and equitable and, mutually beneficial for both Ukraine and Russia.What Russia wanted a year ago:
1. Ukraine doesn't enter NATO and maintains a position of neutrality
2. Crimea is recognised as a territory of Russia
3. Independence is granted to the people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk
4. Ukraine demilitarises and surrenders any weapons which constitute a threat to Russia
5. Ukraine goes through a process of denazification, which would essentially constitute a change of government based on Putin's previous words about the Ukrainian leadership.
6. Russian becomes the second official language of Ukraine and any laws which prohibit its use are repealed.
points 4 & 5 could have been negotiated around.
But now not sure, and 3 would now be 'recognised as part of Russia'. Thanks Boris & co.
What Russia wanted a year ago:
1. Ukraine doesn't enter NATO and maintains a position of neutrality
2. Crimea is recognised as a territory of Russia
3. Independence is granted to the people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk
4. Ukraine demilitarises and surrenders any weapons which constitute a threat to Russia
5. Ukraine goes through a process of denazification, which would essentially constitute a change of government based on Putin's previous words about the Ukrainian leadership.
6. Russian becomes the second official language of Ukraine and any laws which prohibit its use are repealed.
points 4 & 5 could have been negotiated around.
But now not sure, and 3 would now be 'recognised as part of Russia'. Thanks Boris & co.
Claims not to support Russia, but resolutely panders to Russian propaganda and proliferates the message unironically.What Russia wanted a year ago:
1. Ukraine doesn't enter NATO and maintains a position of neutrality
2. Crimea is recognised as a territory of Russia
3. Independence is granted to the people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk
4. Ukraine demilitarises and surrenders any weapons which constitute a threat to Russia
5. Ukraine goes through a process of denazification, which would essentially constitute a change of government based on Putin's previous words about the Ukrainian leadership.
6. Russian becomes the second official language of Ukraine and any laws which prohibit its use are repealed.
points 4 & 5 could have been negotiated around.
But now not sure, and 3 would now be 'recognised as part of Russia'. Thanks Boris & co.
That would be the one where Russia sent minor ranked officials with no power to deviate from their demands.??
Question was asked. Just posted what they tabled a year ago, that Ukraine was going to enter into negotions about, before Boris visited.
How do we discuss like this?
So by your definition Russia is a cancer.What Russia wanted a year ago:
1. Ukraine doesn't enter NATO and maintains a position of neutrality
2. Crimea is recognised as a territory of Russia
3. Independence is granted to the people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk
4. Ukraine demilitarises and surrenders any weapons which constitute a threat to Russia
5. Ukraine goes through a process of denazification, which would essentially constitute a change of government based on Putin's previous words about the Ukrainian leadership.
6. Russian becomes the second official language of Ukraine and any laws which prohibit its use are repealed.
points 4 & 5 could have been negotiated around.
But now not sure, and 3 would now be 'recognised as part of Russia'. Thanks Boris & co.
??
Question was asked. Just posted what they tabled a year ago, that Ukraine was going to enter into negotions about, before Boris visited.
How do we discuss like this?
Citation needed, preferably not from one of your more dubious sources.??
Question was asked. Just posted what they tabled a year ago, that Ukraine was going to enter into negotions about, before Boris visited.
That list of points was and will be rejected because it gives in to 99% of Russian demands without any Russian concessionsHow do we discuss like this?