Gyre
Executive Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 9,928
But why are they leaving the African paradise that came into being on 27 April 1994?
Why is anyone leaving then?
But why are they leaving the African paradise that came into being on 27 April 1994?
Are you telling me only the skilled are leaving? Or is it anyone with the means to sustain themselves in their host countries as well?
So paying more for the same service as another person, for a service you already paid for via exhorbant taxes is what? And why do you think that makes sense.Seems you have a major misunderstanding of socialism. Socialised healthcare is where your taxes cover your healthcare, there are no pay tiers at the hospital, as the example laid out
I like how the default is leaving, like staying is not even worth it anymore, fubar, nobody really wants to live under the monster they helped create.. A real world frANCkenstein situation lol.
Cant say this wasn't predicted hey..
Family.
I’m sure if Europe never settled in this region surely by now the wheel would have been invented in a rock form, like The Flintstones, yaba dabba do!Exactly. No countries, just tribes.
Not all of Europe had countries either in the 16th century.Exactly. No countries, just tribes.
We're not talking about permanent residency.There is no chance I will get into the UK as a permanent resident due to my age despite my son and daughter being full British citizens and me having skills the UK desperately seeks.
The difference is that Africa would still be like that in the 21st century.Not all of Europe had countries either in the 16th century.
Name one that prospered under colonialism.
That is true, however when there is not that many tax payers it simply can not cover for large population, so in order to have complete care you will have to have additional insurance or it can work as it works in my country with socialized health care.Seems you have a major misunderstanding of socialism. Socialised healthcare is where your taxes cover your healthcare, there are no pay tiers at the hospital, as the example laid out
Most of Europe was illiterate back in the 16th century. Had it not been possible to colonise the world, do you think the wars at the time would have given Europe chance to develop? With what resources? Colonialism to some extend worked positively for both sides. Europe is where it is because of it. Africa developed to some extend because of it.The difference is that Africa would still be like that in the 21st century.
But why not? If they can make more working overseas, why shouldn't they?
Those countries wouldn't be where they are today if not of colonialism so it works both ways.
Come on Cosmik. Come on. Why do you think there were laws preventing people from moving to urban areas? Had such laws not existed, we would have ended up with slums like we have today. That's why those with no purpose were banished to the homelands. Look at the rest of Africa to see the point I'm raising. Many had no segregation laws and their cities were surrounded by slums.All did. There was very little unemployment.
No such was promised. Promises made were free basic services and education. There was not even promose of free housing. RDP program started under the GNU.Not the dispute. A Wakanda was promised in 1994. That's the reason SA'ns are in Dubai. If the Wakanda was delivered as promised, no SA'ns would use their expensive freedom of movement right to go anywhere.
No such was promised.Where is the Wakanda SA was promised?
Are you telling me all non-black students at medical schools around the country have 6+A's?
Let me put it this way. Let's compare 2 poor people; one living in a shack in the city and the other living in a mud house in a decent yard in the countryside. Who's better off?The African countries have regressed post colonial independence.
Government or private sector? What level? Mind showing proof of this or pointing me in the right direction?
Why is anyone leaving then?