MickeyD
RIP
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2010
- Messages
- 139,117
It doesn't matter how much SASCOC’s expensive, “buddy, buddy” public relations company spins it, South Africa has once again under achieved at the Commonwealth Games.
I’m not for one minute blaming any of the athletes who all gave 120% in an effort to win medals but one needs to look at the facts.
Code:Medals table: 2002 2006 2010 2014 SA medals 46 38 33 40 Winning country 207 224 177 174
Should we be satisfied with 40 medals after getting 46 back in 2002?
Should we be satisfied to finish behind New Zealand and Scotland on the medals table (two countries together that have a 5th of our population)?
SASCOC predicted 43 medals for the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow.
43 was a very cautious estimate, considering they didn't want to expose themselves as they did with the London Olympics, when they predicted 12 medals and we got six.
And I can assure you, SASCOC didn't factor in seven lawn bowls medals in Glasgow in their tally of 43.
What an unbelievable achievement from our bowlers, in a sport that survives on scraps when it comes to funding.
So, take away the seven bowls medals and Chad Le Clos’s remarkable seven swimming medals and what are you left with?
It is 26 medals from 118 athletes (excluding the team sports), who SASCOC selected on the criteria that they were ranked top 5 in the Commonwealth and medal potential.
“We came here for medals, not to run around in the streets of Glasgow.” – SASCOC president, Gideon Sam
Perhaps, that’s why we didn't have any marathon runners at the Games.
If the Australian winner of the men’s marathon was South African, he wouldn't have gone to the Games on SASCOC’s selection criteria.
That’s how wrong they've got it.
SA’s Lusapho April, who finished third in the New York City marathon in 2013 wasn't even asked by SASCOC or Athletics SA (ASA) if he was available for the Commonwealth Games.
Read the rest here: http://sportsfire.co.za/sas-commonwealth-games-the-real-story