With the ANC, the issue of picking sides or rather - the ANC coming clean on where its stands is the norm and taking any tough action well, it has a track record.
EU Ambassador to South Africa Riina Kionka also expressed frustration with South Africa’s position.
“Sitting on the fence is not an option,” she said in an emailed response to questions. “Once we figure out what the South African government stance really is” the EU will consider what the repercussions are, she said.
Put the Russia aside for a moment and consider these ......
Zuma, presidency - how long did it take for the ANC to come out and admit that he was bad for SA?
How long did it take them to make a statement on Ace Magashule?
How did the ANC deal with Robert Mugabe?
What was their take on Al-Basheer?
How long before they acted on the Guptas?
How did they deal with Nobel Laureate the Dalai Lama?
Lest I remind you, ANC sat on the fence with Syria and abstained on the vote on possible sanctions.
The effects of this flip flopping and double speak can be felt closer to home too.
SA has an all inclusive constitution and is non racial democracy, that just happens to discriminate against certain race groups.
Property rights are enshrined in the constitution - but the push to implement land expropriation without compensation is looming, so how enshrined are those property rights?
On the other hand, India abstained in the UN, but have made clear their position on why they abstained, and how they intend to act, even if it isn't what the US wants to hear.
The ANC fence sitting is the issue.