The old anthem of "our children are our future" may sound like a cliche, but in raising them with a certain set of morals and worldview has a massive impact of who they become and how they will in-turn shape the world we leave to them.
So you'd prefer to raise them to think that it's ok to lie, swear, be rude, kill and blow each other up. Because it's ok to watch that on TV, because it makes you feel less uncomfortable. Just don't watch teh pornz.

This is why this country, and continent in general, is turning into a pile of schit. People have their priorities all wrong. We will end up leaving our children a schithole, because the message we convey to them is that violence is ok. Whereas people in more liberal countries, where naked people is not an issue but human rights is, will leave their children a far more peaceful and respectful country.
 
So you'd prefer to raise them to think that it's ok to lie, swear, be rude, kill and blow each other up. Because it's ok to watch that on TV, because it makes you feel less uncomfortable. Just don't watch teh pornz.

This is why this country, and continent in general, is turning into a pile of schit. People have their priorities all wrong. We will end up leaving our children a schithole, because the message we convey to them is that violence is ok. Whereas people in more liberal countries, where naked people is not an issue but human rights is, will leave their children a far more peaceful and respectful country.

Mike,

As I mentioned in one of my prior posts, it is well documented that children model their behaviour and form their worldview on what they see around them while growing up. This of course includes lying, swearing, violence etc. as you quite rightly point out.

This thread was focused on porn in the media, and as a result my posts related mostly to that. I do however agree with you that the media often carries content which includes the behaviour you mentioned (sometimes glorifying it).

If you (and by you, I mean society at large) believe that there is too much violence (or pornography or whatever) in the media and that this conveys a message to children which is not acceptable or compatible with your moral views, society needs to address this with the media.

Exactly how one would do this remains a challenge. Added to that, most people are just too busy with everyday challenges. As a result, these important, but not urgent challenges, normally fall by the wayside as one just tries to "survive". As such we leave media to make those decisions for us.

I would hazard a guess that more often than not they (the media) base their decisions on their bottom line and not on what is best for society.

If you think about it, do you want them to be making the decisions at all (whether based on their bottom line or their view of whats best for society)?

There is most likely a lot of heated debating required to come to a somewhat reasonable solution that would be acceptable to the majority and would offend or downright infuriate some.

If the holier than though super religious zealot is happy with the media, then content is too restricted and censored, conversely if the horney goat is masturbating hourly to explicit BDSM on SABC1,2,3 etc. content is probably too explicit and so on...

Now we just need a horney goat and a relegious zealot to use when determining what to screen... any volunteers? :)
 
Porn on TV is less easily available. You need a PIN, you need a seperate subscription. The only way to make it less easily available is an outright ban.

Agreed, the flip-side is that those restrictions are relaxed (I would argue that there is a financial incentive) and explicit hard porn becomes part of your standard bouquet.

It is legal to sell a porn magazine. It is legal to sell a porn video. It is legal to host porn on the internet. So if it's banned on TV, then we are treating different kinds of media differently.

Those media channels are different, a magazine for instance cannot be broadcast like TV, but I agree with your sentiment. There probably should be more parity.
 
CONCESSION BY DEFENCE IN CHALLENGE TO PORN CHANNELS

Lawyers for On Digital Media conceded in court on Monday that it required to be registered with the Film and Publication Board to screen X-rated content on its three porn pay channels.

Advocate Steven Budlender told the Western Cape High Court that the Independent Communications Authority of SA (Icasa) should therefore have set this as a condition before issuing a licence to his client.

However, Budlender argued that the omission was no reason to set aside On Digital Media's licence to operate the three channels but rather that the court should as a corrective measure impose the condition.

"Your lordship has the power to grant substitution," he argued before Judge Lee Bozalek.

The hearing was due to continue after lunch.

On Digital Media's counsel had previously argued that Icasa had no choice but to issue the licence as there are no restrictions in South Africa against adults watching pornography.

The company (operating as Top TV and later StarSat) was granted licences last April to broadcast Playboy TV, Desire TV, and Brazzers, subject to conditions.

The Justice Alliance of South Africa (Jasa) is seeking a court order obliging Icasa to rehear its licence application, arguing that it erred in approving it.

In addition, Jasa argued that ODM had not been truthful to Icasa in disclosing what content would be on the channel.

Jasa lawyer Darryl Cooke has argued that he had deduced from the names of the programmes offered by the channels overseas that they promoted infidelity and unsafe sex.

"The true content of the material wasn't told to Icasa. They acted under a misapprehension and therefore they took irrelevant considerations into account".


Source : Sapa /ef/jk/ar/lp
Date : 13 Oct 2014 14:20
 
Cause porn is more dangerous than unroadworthy trucks...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter