SA public to have say on next chief justice, for the first time

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
44,887
I see the Helen Suzman Foundation are opposing some candidates being short-listed, the obvious ones, but hey, the presidency said that all these candidates met the criteria,


President Cyril Ramaphosa appointed a Shortlisting Panel to assist in recommending candidates for the position of the Chief Justice. On 15 October 2021, the Helen Suzman Foundation (“HSF”) submitted its objections to the Shortlisting Panel against Judge President John Hlophe and the Public Protector, Adv Busisiwe Mkhwebane.

The position of Chief Justice can be considered one of the most important positions in our democracy. Integral to a strong and independent Judiciary, which the public can have confidence in, is the Chief Justice. It therefore must be a person of unblemished integrity who embodies the qualities of independence and impartiality, not to mention having the administrative skills which are needed by the head of the Judiciary.

The HSF submits that both Judge President Hlophe and Adv Mkhwebane do not possess the requirements for leading the Judiciary. Neither candidate meets the criteria set out by the Shortlisting Panel. The findings of the Judicial Conduct Tribunal and the Judicial Service Commission of gross misconduct against Judge President Hlophe and the subsequent impeachment proceedings which are underway in the National Assembly, make him unfit to hold the position of Chief Justice. Likewise, the findings made by the National Assembly’s Independent Panel against Adv Mkhwebane, detailing her incompetence and misconduct, also render her unsuited to hold the position. The HSF therefore strongly objects to the shortlisting of either Judge President Hlophe and Adv Mkhwebane for the position of Chief Justice, as it is clear that neither has the requisite competence or, we believe, the integrity.
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
89,131
It's a farce, the whole thing is about soft social skills and not fsck about legal acumen.

Mogoeng for example should never have been chief justice. Someone like Moseneke was denied that position because he did not cater to politicians.

The judiciary and country is at serious risk due to the politicized JSC.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
17,037
It's a farce, the whole thing is about soft social skills and not fsck about legal acumen.

Mogoeng for example should never have been chief justice. Someone like Moseneke was denied that position because he did not cater to politicians.

The judiciary and country is at serious risk due to the politicized JSC.

This is what I have been saying for a while on MyBB but I get shot down every time I do by the usual suspects.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
44,887
Casino meeting went really well...


Next chief justice: Former spy boss Arthur Fraser objects to Zondo's nomination​


Former spy boss Arthur Fraser has objected to the nomination of Raymond Zondo as the next chief justice, saying he is not "fit and proper" to hold the position.

In a letter to the short-listing panel on Friday, Fraser accused Zondo of lacking objectivity and integrity.

"Despite my repeated requests to be given an opportunity to appear before him in order to state my version and to defend myself against a well-orchestrated narrative and propaganda against me, Deputy Chief Justice Zondo made sure that I neither presented my version nor got an opportunity to cross-examine those he called to testify against me.

"No independent-minded judge would act in this manner," he said.

Fraser's lawyer, Eric Mabuza, confirmed the letter was sent, but said "no comment".

The Judicial Service Commission was not immediately available for comment. Their comment will be added once received.

An incredibly rich statement made by Arthur Fraser, and let's not go into his commission testimony...
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
44,887
In the case between Hlophe and Mkhwebane it was always going to be the one or the other. One had to withdraw. Both has been nominated by the SA Natives Forum. Both came under scrutiny, as some are in the view that neither met the requirements. It makes sense that Mkhwebane would withdraw, being the public protector and all.

Hlophe though... I don't see how he has any chance unless there is political meddling.

I don't believe Alan Nelson will be taken under consideration, because reasons... and so there will be only 4 possibilities.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
44,887
He had a bloody cheek to even stand.

He was nominated, not exactly his own decision, though I guess that you must accept or decline the nomination. The SA Natives Forum seem more and more like an ATM spawned body, which is supported by the EFF and the ANC side RET.

At this point in time, it doesn't seem that there were all that many nominations then... well it is reported to be eight in total, but all eight candidates have been opposed, and somehow both Hlophe's and Mkhwebane's nomination was allowed and being approved as meeting the criterion which the Helen Suzman Foundation challenged, and since then Mkhwebane has withdrawn and now Hlophe has not made the shortlist.
 

CTSA

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
371
Looks like Eastern Cape.
That's what I initially thought, because of her roles before the SCA. But I would say it's more than just the legal profession in the EC that supports her.

Because the twitter account is "FriendsofZuma", I was thinking for a moment it stood for "Economic Capital" haha (considering the SCA's usual commercial law acumen and misinterpreted "business-friendliness").
 
Last edited:
Top