biometrics
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2003
- Messages
- 71,858
I just drive a normal car, I don't have to drive through rivers and over mountains to get to the shop, so, a Focus...
![]()
Sounds horrible.
I just drive a normal car, I don't have to drive through rivers and over mountains to get to the shop, so, a Focus...
![]()
Because it's part of the chip.At the end of the day the customer should be able to choose whether they want to use Bluetooth or the jack and not force the one.
I don't think I've seen a smartphone without Bluetooth yet its hardly used (lets be honest) so why haven't they removed that?
So why did they remove the tape deck from car radios you think?
I don't think I've seen a smartphone without Bluetooth yet its hardly used (lets be honest) so why haven't they removed that?
Another feature pioneered by Apple.
Who?Actually not, it was removed on at least 2 Android makers phones before Apple did it.
Another feature pioneered by Apple.
So wireless is not superior to wired?Because they replaced it with the superior CD, they didnt just remove it for nothing.
Because it's part of the chip.
Millions of people use Bluetooth, either in car or with headset/headphones. Strange idea to think it's not used.
So wireless is not superior to wired?
Does facebook look better on fibre?Wifi vs ethernet or fiber? Mmm?
Does facebook look better on fibre?
If it was used so much, then why do so many drive with the phone stuck to their ear in their fancy bluetooth enabled cars?
Wireless can have interference, wired... unlikely.
Yes but it's still part of the chip. It's not economical to go mass produce two different variants of a chip.Still has aerial and thus uses space, it's like nano and micro sim issue. Yeah, space is at such a premium one just has to use nano sim cause micro is so massive and now one has to sim swap when getting a new phone and and and...