grok
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2007
- Messages
- 28,671
Interesting article theorising how the S3 design is a direct result of Apple's recent lawsuit against Samsung.
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...irst-smartphone-designed-entirely-by-lawyers/
edit: spartphone? really? mods please fix.
The Galaxy S III is... well... it's ugly. There's really no other way to put it. But why? Why is it ugly? I don't mean aesthetically, why is it ugly, I mean, "How did something like this ever make it out of Samsung's design studio?" I'll tell you how, it was never in the design studio. This phone design was born down the hall, in a room where the door sign reads "Samsung Legal."
...
So there you have it. A darn-near perfect explanation of the GSIII design. Sure, it's butt ugly, but it's also 100% (well maybe 90%) lawyer approved. An amorphous, unsymmetrical blob that doesn't come in black, with a non-permanent dock and non-square icons. There's no way Apple can add this design to their Samsung lawsuit.
So Samsung, was it worth it? Your product won't sell as well, but you won't piss off one of your biggest component customers either. I understand the motivation, but I still feel like you've sold your soul.
When Apple started patent trolling, they basically admitted they weren't going to win in an open market, and they decided to drag Samsung down with them. The crazy thing is, Samsung is letting them. They've ceded ownership of the rectangle and other common sense design traits to Apple, and did everything they could to bow down to their largest customer.
The result? A phone designed by lawyers. What a scary precedent.
A rectangle product shape ...
Substantial black borders above and below the screen having roughly equal width ..
a display of a grid of colorful square icons with uniformly rounded corners
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...irst-smartphone-designed-entirely-by-lawyers/
edit: spartphone? really? mods please fix.
Last edited: