Sat3 lifespan?

Surv0

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
5,742
So apparently the SAT3 cable has a limited lifetime, that would be granted as everything degrades after time. But does anyone actually know how long weve been using the SAT3 and what happens after the so-called 25yr lifespan? They just gonna forget about it or dredge it up to lay a new one?
 

Kasyx

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,565
I would assume that it is constantly maintained and upgraded as the years go by so as to prevent that.

Correct me if I am wrong.
 

Surv0

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
5,742
Yeah they definitely maintain it but not sure if they actually upgrade it...I would imagine that if they had to upgrade it they would have to upgrade the whole thing at once because it would be pretty pointless having only a certain portion of the line working faster than the rest...
 

linkinpark

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2005
Messages
1,336
The life span of almost all cables are around 25 years. Ongoing maintenance is just there to ensure it reaches its lifetime of 25 years, after that another cable has to be built.
 

bullfrog

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Messages
2,068
I'm not exactly sure how the whole think works, but AFAIK it's a fibre optic cable and those can't be joined. So if it degrades it will have to be replaced some time.
 

SuperAntMD

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
1,063
It can be upgraded to handle more capacity and I believe SAT3 already has been, but thats more a matter of the technology on either side of the cable then the cable itself.

The cable is merely maintained, if memory serves there is a dedicated boat for just this purpose.

After 25 years new cable needs to be laid but Telkom (or whoever) will probably continue using it until it actually stops working. Its not like they just forget about it after the lifespan is up.
 

64bit

New Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
5
F/O cables can definately be joined. Only question is how they would do that under water... ?
 

krycor

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
18,546
doesn't a ship pull it up? or is that just when it gets laid?
 

bullfrog

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Messages
2,068
I'm talking from the greatest experience here as I've never worked with fibre ofptic cables. Just talking from what I've read out of a text book. :eek:
 

Surv0

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
5,742
Yeah Telkom has an entire ship dedicated to maintaining the line. Afaik they do use joiners that are located on the ocean floor which can be lifted for repairs. They actually lift the cable out of the water and then work on it...
 

Kasyx

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,565
They have a ship dedicated to maintaining a cable, and they can't provide us with decent broadband prices?

Oh wait, sorry. I mean "won't".
 

rsachoc

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
811
Interesting dicussion, what I dont understand is this: if the cable has a limited lifespan, why not open up all the available bandwidth for us to use, they'll probably make more money in the long run - seems such a waste to use a smaller portion of the total bandwidth when the cable is going to be decommisioned in the future anyways.
 

Kasyx

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,565
Because Telkom only understand the "Make Money Now" approach. Delayed gratification is not in their collective vocabulary.
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,424
Interesting dicussion, what I dont understand is this: if the cable has a limited lifespan, why not open up all the available bandwidth for us to use, they'll probably make more money in the long run - seems such a waste to use a smaller portion of the total bandwidth when the cable is going to be decommisioned in the future anyways.
It is an utter waste but you can see why they do it.

In normal society I'd question why they're allowed to get away from it but I've been around here not to have.
 

derekc

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
2,058
Interesting dicussion, what I dont understand is this: if the cable has a limited lifespan, why not open up all the available bandwidth for us to use, they'll probably make more money in the long run - seems such a waste to use a smaller portion of the total bandwidth when the cable is going to be decommisioned in the future anyways.

because Telkom's the equipment in South Africa is not capable and they want to squeeze every cent out of their old equipment rather than upgrade them.
 

Surv0

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
5,742
Well as the review on Myadsl says, the SAT3 cable is highly underutilised. But why would Telkom actually open the whole line up for use when it doesnt need to. Its getting all the money it needs from all the companies registered them using only a small portion of the line...
 

Pilgrim

Wugger
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
3,099
I just read this on the official sat-3 website (www.safe-sat3.co.za)

September 2000 Press release:
Telkom spearheads $630 million dollar telecommunications project to fuel African Renaissance.

No, that is not what they did. They took the spear and shafted it up our South African behinds... :eek:
 
Top