Sign up with Google
Natas
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2006
- Messages
- 2,309
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=vn20061220125749269C460334
Shaik has now gone for exploritory surgery cause there is somehtin wrong with his heart but they don't know what. Thats brilliant!!! He has effectively set up an excuse as to why, when his Con Court appeal fails, he cant go to jail or at least needs to go to a medical facility, which has less security and is populated by less hardcore inamtes.
If i were his lawyer I would say: Although Mr Shaik has been found guilty and has been sentenced to serve time in jail, he cannot be confined to jail because as a result of a heart condition Mr Shaik requires constant medicla attention. While Mr Shaik needs to pay for his crimes his cannot be expeced to do so at teh risk of his life. It is therefore argued before this honourbale court that alternative mechanims be empoyed to ensure that Mr Shaik serves his debt to society. it is humbly suggested that Mr Shaik be amde to serve the very community he has wronged, what better way to achieve a balance between the repayment of a civil benefit and the preservation of Mr Shaik's right to life, which I might add is an inalliable right as enshrined in our own Constitution.
Shaik has now gone for exploritory surgery cause there is somehtin wrong with his heart but they don't know what. Thats brilliant!!! He has effectively set up an excuse as to why, when his Con Court appeal fails, he cant go to jail or at least needs to go to a medical facility, which has less security and is populated by less hardcore inamtes.
If i were his lawyer I would say: Although Mr Shaik has been found guilty and has been sentenced to serve time in jail, he cannot be confined to jail because as a result of a heart condition Mr Shaik requires constant medicla attention. While Mr Shaik needs to pay for his crimes his cannot be expeced to do so at teh risk of his life. It is therefore argued before this honourbale court that alternative mechanims be empoyed to ensure that Mr Shaik serves his debt to society. it is humbly suggested that Mr Shaik be amde to serve the very community he has wronged, what better way to achieve a balance between the repayment of a civil benefit and the preservation of Mr Shaik's right to life, which I might add is an inalliable right as enshrined in our own Constitution.
..