Scientist invents real Star Trek tricorder

guest2013-1

guest
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Messages
19,808
Big whoop. It can take temp/humidity and calculate distances. My iPhone can do that (not really, but this isn't new tech at all)

Wake me up when he can get the thing to analyze substances and it breaks down stuff into the materials an object is comprised of.
 

Ockie

Resident Lead Bender
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
51,371
Cool...but I want a damn replictor! FREE FOOD!!!!! nom nom.
 

Elimentals

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 11, 2010
Messages
10,819
Meh ... Why not rather work on teleportation?
The Fly put me off that idea.

No way I will ever try it with today's tech doesn't matter how many times someone tell me its safe.

Oh technically speaking transporters and replicators are one in the same tech. The one just reads+destroys the object and recreated it at a different location the other just use a stored pattern to recreate the object.(Think of it as playing a song from a recording vs listening to a live recording via the same medium)

So one creates from memory the other creates from a scanned object. Seeing that you can technically duplicate the object and opt not to destroy it, the question that comes up is, if its in fact a duplicate as you can simply opt not to destroy the original. So yep they killing Capt Kirk every time the beam him to a planet.

The Fly issue was covered with Bio filters but wasn't 100% efficient in the start for humans and thus we saw riots and banning in United Earth before the forming of the Federation. Only later with future contacts with Vulcans and other space fairing nations did they develop tech to start transporting humans. Also only in case of an emergency at 1st. They also had metaphysical debates on the matter of duplication but I guess they didn't have religion at that time as that would have killed the transportation tech stone cold dead in its tracks.

Oh crap... did I just debate Star Trek tech.... /me hides before someone say I am a trekkie.
 
Last edited:

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
91,280
The Fly put me off that idea.

No way I will ever try it with today's tech doesn't matter how many times someone tell me its safe.

Oh technically speaking transporters and replicators are one in the same tech. The one just reads+destroys the object and recreated it at a different location the other just use a stored pattern to recreate the object.(Think of it as playing a song from a recording vs listening to a live recording via the same medium)

So one creates from memory the other creates from a scanned object. Seeing that you can technically duplicate the object and opt not to destroy it, the question that comes up is, if its in fact a duplicate as you can simply opt not to destroy the original. So yep they killing Capt Kirk every time the beam him to a planet.

The Fly issue was covered with Bio filters but wasn't 100% efficient in the start for humans and thus we saw riots and banning in United Earth before the forming of the Federation. Only later with future contacts with Vulcans and other space fairing nations did they develop tech to start transporting humans. Also only in case of an emergency at 1st. They also had metaphysical debates on the matter of duplication but I guess they didn't have religion at that time as that would have killed the transportation tech stone cold dead in its tracks.

Oh crap... did I just debate Star Trek tech.... /me hides before someone say I am a trekkie.
*points and laughs at the Trekkie* :D
 

OGroteKoning

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
10,741
The Fly put me off that idea.

No way I will ever try it with today's tech doesn't matter how many times someone tell me its safe.

Oh technically speaking transporters and replicators are one in the same tech. The one just reads+destroys the object and recreated it at a different location the other just use a stored pattern to recreate the object.(Think of it as playing a song from a recording vs listening to a live recording via the same medium)

So one creates from memory the other creates from a scanned object. Seeing that you can technically duplicate the object and opt not to destroy it, the question that comes up is, if its in fact a duplicate as you can simply opt not to destroy the original. So yep they killing Capt Kirk every time the beam him to a planet.

The Fly issue was covered with Bio filters but wasn't 100% efficient in the start for humans and thus we saw riots and banning in United Earth before the forming of the Federation. Only later with future contacts with Vulcans and other space fairing nations did they develop tech to start transporting humans. Also only in case of an emergency at 1st. They also had metaphysical debates on the matter of duplication but I guess they didn't have religion at that time as that would have killed the transportation tech stone cold dead in its tracks.

Oh crap... did I just debate Star Trek tech.... /me hides before someone say I am a trekkie.
I feel "trekked" ... lol ... then first we must invent poison in ... say ... a can that can be sprayed on insects to kill them before they merge with the teletransportee ... thus dooming them to death ... let's call such a device DOOM!

Sent from my Galaxy S II
 

guest2013-1

guest
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Messages
19,808
They've been able to teleport particles by 2 meters before. It was several years ago already so can't remember exactly, but they did say they had to add a (what I call) "control" particle to be able to assemble the other one on the other end correctly.

What I find fascinating though is Capt. Kirk was a duplicate/clone from the first time they used the transporter. So you only see the REAL Kirk in the beginning of the series, lollerskates
 

Valerion

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
1,922
What I find fascinating though is Capt. Kirk was a duplicate/clone from the first time they used the transporter. So you only see the REAL Kirk in the beginning of the series, lollerskates
You are referring to "The Enemy Within"? That is a split, not a duplicate or clone, both Kirks were not identical. And at the end they get recombined, not left as they were.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Enemy_Within_(Star_Trek)
 
Top