SEACOM clear to land?

texo

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
1,586
It's sounding very good to me. Unless Ivy throws another spanner in the works.
 

Syndyre

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
16,821
Let's just hope it actually happens.

Deputy Director General for ICT Infrastructure Development at the Department of Communications (DoC), Rosey Sekese, said that cables wanting to land in South Africa need to be majority African owned.

But this is just stupid.
 

ldmelsa

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
5,694
The World Bank’s Khalil shared this view, saying that he is perplexed as to why the South African Government would put obstacles in place for cables that want to land in the country, especially if it is funded by private industry players.

Welcome to Africa. :rolleyes:
 

Pilgrim

Wugger
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
3,099
The World Bank’s Khalil shared this view, saying that he is perplexed as to why the South African Government would put obstacles in place for cables that want to land in the country, especially if it is funded by private industry players.

Don't worry, these obstacles are put in place so that international companies can overcome them with bribes here and there.

Without these obstacles how would Ivy fund herself?

This is the african way :sick: Beg here, bribe there. :eek:
 

magneto

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
762
"The World Bank’s Khalil shared this view, saying that he is perplexed as to why the South African Government would put obstacles in place for cables that want to land in the country, especially if it is funded by private industry players."

i'll put it in 3 simply word : they are stuipd!!!!

thats y.
 

Axis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
438
I agree with Pilgrim. SEACOM backhander was bigger tham EASY"s
 

SSurfer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
104
Can you believe it a tiny step in the right direction YEEEEEEHAAAAAA!!!!
 

a-person

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
1,184
"The World Bank’s Khalil shared this view, saying that he is perplexed as to why the South African Government would put obstacles in place for cables that want to land in the country, especially if it is funded by private industry players."

Dear Ivy

Why you are so stupid?

Thanking you for not replying,

The SA People
 

jamieb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2004
Messages
228
Well, clearly there are individuals within government who would like to prevent market entrants from entering to protect their present or planned investments. Any fool could see that allowing as many players as possible into the market will be beneficial to South Africa. The downfall of this government is that it continues to use BEE to justify its bizarre regulations, which ultimately serve to enrich around ten people in the economy.
 

LabAnimal

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
4,187
When the cables are here, connected and the prices drop with uncapped fast internet being offered from everywhere... then i'll believe it. Its all still just talk!.
 

Alchemist

Expert Member
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
2,100
Why do I have the song, "Ground Control to Major Tom," stuck in my head?
..."we're living in a tin can"....
 

DblD

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
841
...that SEACOM will be allowed to land in South Africa as it meets all the legal requirements.

What legal requirement is that? The ministry bribe chapter?

Gods truth, those incompetent government apes are forgetting that bad government policy IS DIRECTLY responsible for the information technology stunted growth and its impact on economical growth.

WAKE UP, YOU ARE NOW ADDRESSING THE INTELLIGENT VOTER CONSTITUENCY.
The simplified bull**** used in your general campaign that got you fat positions you are now abusing, does not and will not fly here.
 
Top