R30/month for a 1Mbit/s circuit
This is pure guesswork based on information on their site, but TENET currently has around 200Mb/s international capacity (all via SAT-3 \ SAFE) and 300Mb/s total peering (IOW, international & local) capacity. For this they paid about R64mil in 2006. Ratioing the costs I get around R43mil for the international bandwidth. This leads to aroundHow much do they currently pay?
Hmm so what do I need to do to qualify for a deal like this![]()
afaik this is not too far off the mark - the reduction is effectively in the order of 100's of timesThis is pure guesswork based on information on their site, but TENET currently has around 200Mb/s international capacity (all via SAT-3 \ SAFE) and 300Mb/s total peering (IOW, international & local) capacity. For this they paid about R64mil in 2006. Ratioing the costs I get around R43mil for the international bandwidth. This leads to around
R18 000 per 1Mb/s per month, which seems in line with Telkom's commercial pricing of around R45 000 per 1Mb/s per month (I didn't take bulk buying into account, as Telkom doesn't disclose their pricing on high bandwidth links).
The Seacom offer seems likes the deal of millenium.
Disclaimer: The above analysis may be complete and utter BS![]()
Unfortunately telecoms is not recognised as a constitutional human rightdominic, I know this is just me venting, but surely this matter could be taken to the constitutional court and argued that government are effectively hampering the peoples right to cheap, affordable telecommunications? Obviously a very strong case would have to be built first
Well it shouldUnfortunately telecoms is not recognised as a constitutional human right![]()
Unfortunately telecoms is not recognised as a constitutional human right![]()
Yeah, but as long as the government differentiates between voice and data, that's not likely to pass muster in the concourt.Well, shouldn't the fact that telecoms being considered a basic service, like water a electricity be used to argue the fact that is a basic human service.
We'll it appears government are planning put a damper on this idea too:
http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?t=84462
At a press conference in July, Shope-Mafole indicated government was not in favour of commercial cables such as Seacom and its potential rival Eassy (the East African Submarine Cable System) landing in SA. She noted the Nepad Broadband Infrastructure network was considering laying its own East Coast cable.
At the time, Shope-Mafole said government did not believe commercial cables would bring down the cost of broadband in SA and government initiatives would be needed.