See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
That would just be plain stupid. It will achieve **** all.
A large percentage of the population doesn't adhere to the lockdown rules anyway so the only thing a second lockdown will achieve is wrecking what remains of the economy. Frikken idiots.
Malnutrition became a problem and will become even worse with a second lockdown and lives will be lost that way.
Or you just washing your hands more often.Nothing to do with the thread but I have found that this year I was only ill before lockdown started and have been fine since. Every other year I'm sick atleast 2-3 times during the april-october period. If nothing else, the masks help contain people's germs to themselves
I suffered from a few medical issues a few years back so had a lowered immune system for a while. Always made a point of taking care of my health as best I could prior to lockdown. Unfortunately I can't live in a bubble, so people always coughing and sneezing got me, or so I imagineOr you just washing your hands more often.
You mean copying the DA's suggestion. No effort required.Well I know what I'll be doing with my lunch break.
Not that another hard lockdown is even logical. They went through all this effort to create stages, but they don't want to use them. If infections increase after going down a stage, then just go up to the previous one again.