May I chance my arm before the thread is closed.High-fives all round!
No reason why one shouldn't question how life came about.May I chance my arm before the thread is closed.
existing life evolved from a common ancestor presumably a single cell.
lt is scientifically incorrect to question how life came into existence because life exist.
and the peer review papers?The theory has been renamed
The unsubstantiated hypothesis of molecules to man evolution.
I agree with what you're saying, though I think evolution is a bit broader than that.Evolution is the adaptation of an organism to its environmental pressures through the selection of favorable chance mutations over time, resulting in specialized mechanisms that endow the organism with a greater survival capability that eventually spreads to its species. Evolutionary processes are therefore attributed to the variegation and extreme specializations of life in all forms.
Do you mind a simple correction, your statement is a lie, breaking one of the ten commandmends mean you have broken every single one of them...Nope, they never lie
...your statement is a lie, breaking one of the ten commandmends mean you have broken every single one of them...
Yet when it first surfaced it was widely spread ~ even on sites that might have since withdrawn it.DSurfing the net show that on many sites creationists indeed warn against using this argument to prove evolution being fake...