Solidarity promises legal action against Eskom's R938 fee for 0kWh users

[OhYeah84]

Bringing legal action, justifiably, against Eskom while...

...oh the other hand working with Gordhan to fix it.

 

[BeerIsNotGood...]

Bringing legal action, justifiably, against Eskom while...

...oh the other hand working with Gordhan to fix it.

Another retarded comment

 

[Utterly Confused]

Eskom: Please don't use our product we don't have enough for everyone. We have to take turns using the product.
Eskom: Please use energy efficient products to lower usage, switch off devices when not in use.
Eskom: We will charge you a tariff for not using our product enough. Less usage more tariff.

Good reply, just what I was thinking. Bunch of fscking clowns.

 

[superskully]

You’re missing the point. There is no logic, no thought given and definitely no intelligence. It’s based solely on the usual “how can we make money now today so we can steal it regardless of tomorrow.”

Maybe read more carefully. We already know that. This is in addition

 

[TheMightyQuinn]

Bringing legal action, justifiably, against Eskom while...

...oh the other hand working with Gordhan to fix it.

And...?

 

[OhYeah84]

And...?

I was highlighting the irony, that's all.

 

[OhYeah84]

Another retarded comment

No knob, it was just pointing out a bit of irony. Excuse me as a very jaded citizen of this country.

 

[TheMightyQuinn]

I was highlighting the irony, that's all.

There is no irony there...

 

[OhYeah84]

There is no irony there...

OK.

 

[dualmeister]

No R900 levy to be imposed on solar users, says energy expert

It’s been reported that Eskom will submit a plan for cost-reflective tariffs which could see solar PV users pay more for services. But an energy expert says this is not the case.

www.enca.com

 

[Mike Hoxbig]

No R900 levy to be imposed on solar users, says energy expert

It’s been reported that Eskom will submit a plan for cost-reflective tariffs which could see solar PV users pay more for services. But an energy expert says this is not the case.

www.enca.com

"Expert" has spoken @Hanno Labuschagne. Best you get his opinion on their official response to you...

 

[SubtleBeast]

"Expert" has spoken @Hanno Labuschagne. Best you get his opinion on their official response to you...

Nope not even worth it. Lips are moving, but saying nothing. Comparing electricity generation to "producing widgets".

 

[Martin 007]

Organization like Solidarity need to be supported.

They are doing amazing work and the average south africa needs to get behind organisation's which make our lives bearable under a communist government.

The Constitutional Court will throw out this nonsense in a second.

Eskom if you can't supply a service either allow us to make an alternative or be sued for not providing the service.

 

[Benedict A55h0le]

Organization like Solidarity need to be supported.

They are doing amazing work and the average south africa needs to get behind organisation's which make our lives bearable under a communist government.

The Constitutional Court will throw out this nonsense in a second.

Eskom if you can't supply a service either allow us to make an alternative or be sued for not providing the service.

I am not so sure, the ANC took the DA to court about the new water levy. DA lost the case but then shuffled some wording and now the Cape has a new permanent water connection levy. ANC will use the same mech to push it through, socialism is supported by law.

 

[system32]

 

[Benedict A55h0le]

View attachment 1350892

E-toll fee and fee admin fee is missing.

 

[HowTo]

That Dick should be put in a firing squad. It shows how mentally they are retarded.
He should receive Esdom diclinous reward, what ever that means.

 

[noxibox]

No R900 levy to be imposed on solar users, says energy expert

It’s been reported that Eskom will submit a plan for cost-reflective tariffs which could see solar PV users pay more for services. But an energy expert says this is not the case.

www.enca.com

He's really saying the same thing in a different way. The lowest users will be hit with the biggest increase. It does mean someone who currently uses almost no electricity will in future be expected to pay a substantial amount.

 

[The Magster]

I won't be the first to say that Eskom and perhaps all of the "management" of our country have lost touch with reality. They live in the own perfect world because these obstacles do not affect them. I'm part of a family of 4 in a fairly decent "middle class" suburb of Cape Town living in a moderate freestanding house using less than 400kWh per month. I don't have solar or inverters or batteries or wind power or a generator. Electrical use - and water - has been rationed for years simply because of the cost. So now I'm going to be penalised for not using more of a product which cannot be supplied even though I really cannot even afford it? Take a clown, put him in a palace...he doesn't become king, the palace becomes a circus!

 

[Benedict A55h0le]

He's really saying the same thing in a different way. The lowest users will be hit with the biggest increase. It does mean someone who currently uses almost no electricity will in future be expected to pay a substantial amount.

The lowest users are probably indigents and they are exempted from any water or electricity connection fees. Thieves are also exempted. The DA is also planning to give the indigents and thieves free solar systems in the Cape.