South African Covid-19 News and Discussions 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Azg

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
3,213
qualifications for jobs that can risk mass death have always been in fashion. it's why civil engineers, doctors, pilots , etc go study.
tell me: do you just troll? is that the whole thing? or does your mom make you get exercise some times?

Calm your tits.
Get back to discussing COVID-19.
 

Azg

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
3,213
Compared to the post standard 5 of our previous president?
No. The issue of qualifications was raised re a minister not being qualified enough because she has a journalism degree.
 

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
Calm your tits.
Get back to discussing COVID-19.


uhhhhhh...we are.

the minister in question is the minister of social development and she's announcing that the couldn't predict the impact of COVID on the poor in South Africa, and the consequent carnage.

on a related note, the idea you have that you will determine what people do or don't discuss is pretty ****ing weird. not sure you're aware of that. if you weren't, you're welcome. if you're moderating, the normal procedure is to read the thread for context, and DM people you think are otherwise distracted. in-line commenting perpetuates the discussion.
 
Last edited:

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
No. The issue of qualifications was raised re a minister not being qualified enough because she has a journalism degree.

that's correct. the Department's core functions are:

Management and oversight over social security, encompassing social assistance and social insurance policies that aim to prevent and alleviate poverty in the event of life cycle risks such as loss of income due to unemployment, disability, old age or death occurring.

Developmental social welfare services that provide support to reduce poverty, vulnerability and the impact of HIV and AIDS through sustainable development programmes in partnership with implementing agents such as State-funded institutions, Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), Community-Based Organisations (CBOs) and Faith-Based Organisations (FBOs).


edit: the Minister leading that department stated on record that she had not been aware that COVID and the COVID response would have such a big impact on poor people. in her Cabinet role, she's responsible for identifying, defining, managing, and leading the programmes that alleviate poverty. so, without even taking COVID into account, she's indicted herself and her performance in the role. however, more immediately, since the recent contortions the government has made to position Cabinet as the actual Disaster Response Centre (and, somehow, the Disaster sub-committee at the same time), she's therefore necessarily been part of determining the response while stating that she had no idea that those decisions would impact the poor. you and everyone else who reads that statement by her should be horrified by the detachment from consequence it exposes, and the utter indifference to the impact of her actions that it implies.
 
Last edited:

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
but thanks. watching, over the last week, the utter inability to discuss complex issues with any degree of nuance or honesty - such as (a) the government's contradictory response to COVID, a response that has significantly highlighted all the fault lines in government and Cabinet, (b) its flailing under legal challenges, (c) its overt and classist attack on poor people, (d) its repeated disregard for law, and (e) its embrace of a particularly nasty and thuggish form of authoritarian force that looks exactly like 1989 - has educated me. specifically, it's reminded me that engagement with people who's preferred online persona is to be a reflexive bot is always a waste of precious life.

good reminder to have.
 
Last edited:

TheChamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
57,360

yes. and is he was put in a specialist development post, there would be problems. what is your point?
The MEC of the same "specialist" department in the WC only has a matric certificate. Rant about that when you get time in your busy schedule.
 

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
The MEC of the same "specialist" department in the WC only has a matric certificate. Rant about that when you get time in your busy schedule.

happy to. i'm not a supporter of them either and you can see why in their responses to the same crisis. (edit: let me be even clearer: they're a wishy-washy, largely neo-liberal holdover, who's vacillation and inability to let go of their past when called on will haunt them forever.) however, the fact that they're idiots doesn't make her any smarter on the subject, and her reach and national impact is a hell of a lot greater, both before COVID and now.

reading your - limited and usually not informative - contribution here, you seem to think that every conversation is a zero-sum, binary, "either-or" kind of engagement. you do realize that these issues are much more important than whether you get to feel like you policed the internet, right? this is not a theoretical issue. do something valuable with your time as well as spend it here:



they take both donations and volunteer work.

edit: FeedSA specifically needs donations, so here's their link: http://www.feedsa.co.za/covid19-action-plan/

edit: climb in here as well: https://giftofthegivers.org/disaster-response/intervention-plan-for-covid-19/

i'd donate time or money to the smaller operations first if you're forced to choose because they tend to go under the radar but people within their reach specifically depend on them. (homeless people are localized and generally aren't catching an Uber to the next food station if the one near them stops operating.)

now i'm going to put you on ignore. if you do decide to affect people's lives for the better, you're welcome to let me know. (or not, frankly.)
 
Last edited:

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
60,620
So this is bizarre - why would they not disclose :


City of Johannesburg - 6071 cases
The Soweto and Inner City region continue to be the Joburg region’s local hotspots, with cases on the increase in these regions as displayed below. The Sandton and Randburg regions also had over 500 active cases.

The Gauteng does not disclose deaths per region, thus, active cases in the region are estimated.

Region A: Diepsloot, Kya Sands, Dainfern, Midrand, Lanseria, Fourways, Ivory Park – 571 cases, 318 active (estimated)

Region B: Randburg, Rosebank, Emmarentia, Greenside, Melville, Mayfair, Northcliff, Parktown, Parktown North – 779 cases, 543 active (estimated)

Region C: Roodepoort, Constantia Kloof, Northgate, Florida, Bram Fishersville – 659 cases, 480 active (estimated)

Region D: Doornkop, Soweto, Dobsonville, Protea Glen – 1017 cases, 720 active (estimated)

Regions E: Alexandra, Wynberg, Sandton, Orange Grove, Houghton – 919 cases, 559 active (estimated)

Region F: Inner City, Johannesburg South – 1 411 cases, 1093 active (estimated)

Region G: Orange Farm, Weilers Farm, Ennerdale, Lenasia, Eldorado Park, Protea South – 436 cases, 288 active (estimated)


 

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
So this is bizarre - why would they not disclose :

honestly, my intuition, watching this unfold, is that testing reach is very poor and therefore the majority of the numbers we're provided are extrapolated. that's the hidden reality underpinning all of this.

edit: extrapolated from a wider range of assumptions, i mean, with data from actual testing playing a negligible role. interpretation of testing data is difficult as it is, given that there are so many factors you have to control for, and in SA, the demographic divide introduces even more. if you add in that testing reach is poor, the empirical portion of the extrapolation likely becomes meaningless.
 
Last edited:

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2020/04/06/what-ordinary-flu-and-pneumonia-death-numbers/

edit: this is where the numbers are going to hide. see Texas, California, New York, Michigan, Illinois, and Florida year-on-year. (one of my data geek friends pointed this to me because she caught the Florida numbers and they looked weird.)

take Texas - in the period Feb and March, they report 6 COVID deaths but in that same period, the total number of deaths attributed to pneumonia alone is 1 825, which is around 600% of the equivalent death total from both pneumonia and influenza in 2018. California's around 410%; Florida is around 630%. same pattern plays out again and again.

realistically, when this is all dusted, you're going to want to look for anomalous spike patterns in reportable non-COVID mortality figures to try and get a sense of the whole.




COVID-19 Deaths, Feb. 1- March 28All Pneumonia Deaths, Feb. 1-March 282020 Pneumonia Deaths As a Percentage of All 2020 DeathsInfluenza and Pneumonia Deaths, March 2018
How the Recent Pneumonia Death Count Compares With Two Comparison Indicators
One of the comparison benchmarks is the number of all deaths for the same period — Feb. 1 through March 28. The other benchmark is the influenza and pneumonia death total for March 2018.
Alabama0 4085.0% 101
Alaska0 233.9% -
Arizona0 5235.0% 118
Arkansas0 2695.0% 61
California54 3,1366.7% 761
Colorado21 3344.8% 82
Connecticut0 -- 98
Delaware0 504.5% 27
District of Columbia0 586.3%-
Florida38 1,8995.1% 301
Georgia13 5704.5% 149
Hawaii0 1186.2% 51
Idaho1 1104.6% 34
Illinois9 1,1556.2% 277
Indiana0 5995.6% 123
Iowa0 2955.9% 67
Kansas3 2405.4% 78
Kentucky0 3896.3% 91
Louisiana44 2583.8% 66
Maine0 1786.7% 38
Maryland5 5025.8% 116
Massachusetts6 6636.7% 163
Michigan11 7965.0% 199
Minnesota4 4075.3% 62
Mississippi0 3426.5% 82
Missouri6 4864.8% 161
Montana0 664.4% 30
Nebraska0 1596.4% 62
Nevada2 2024.6% 54
New Hampshire1 1095.0% 40
New Jersey43 6945.3% 123
New Mexico0 1555.6% 39
New York180 1,3437.6% 448
New York City5791,0125.3%-
North Carolina0 1514.9% 213
North Dakota0 746.6% 15
Ohio0 6764.0% 250
Oklahoma0 3656.3% 71
Oregon5 2304.2% 68
Pennsylvania19 8805.0% 328
Rhode Island0 503.3% 19
South Carolina1 3694.4% 72
South Dakota1 705.5% 32
Tennessee0 7155.8% 156
Texas6 1,8255.6% 301
Utah1 1685.1% 37
Vermont1 424.6% 12
Virginia4 4593.9% 125
Washington92 5615.7% 114
West Virginia0 1405.5% 65
Wisconsin0 3764.1% 126
Wyoming0 425.8% 14
TOTAL 1,150 23,729 6,120
MEDIAN5.2%
Source: National Center for Health Statistics, COVID-19 report for April 3; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Underlying Cause of Death database.
.
 
Last edited:

noxibox

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
23,338

yes. and is he was put in a specialist development post, there would be problems. what is your point?
That would depend. Perhaps someone is in that position because they're strong on organisation and co-ordination. Perhaps they take the trouble to study up as much as they can. Perhaps they surround themselves with experts.

The ANC minister has clearly done none of these things. So she's clueless about the department she is supposed to manage and she is in fact so unbelievably incompetent she has failed to surround herself with experts who could have informed her.
 

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
That would depend. Perhaps someone is in that position because they're strong on organisation and co-ordination. Perhaps they take the trouble to study up as much as they can. Perhaps they surround themselves with experts.

The ANC minister has clearly done none of these things. So she's clueless about the department she is supposed to manage and she is in fact so unbelievably incompetent she has failed to surround herself with experts who could have informed her.

maybe, but when it comes to government, i'm a big fan of politicians being allowed to fill generalist positions but being barred from specialist positions. if we'd had qualified specialists in a number of critical roles (rather than jobs-for-friends) for the last fifteen years, the country would look different.
 

BeerIsNotGood...

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
8,606
maybe, but when it comes to government, i'm a big fan of politicians being allowed to fill generalist positions but being barred from specialist positions. if we'd had qualified specialists in a number of critical roles (rather than jobs-for-friends) for the last fifteen years, the country would look different.
Sounds like you're part of the problem :unsure:
 

daelm

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
1,435
personally, I'd like a state structure that rotated roles amongst the best of its people bearing in mind their ability and skills, and capped salaries dramatically, rather than what we have. which is a popularity contest, with the promise of an infinitely expanding blank cheque (and the ability to auction off communal assets) going to the winner.

but we're very far from that, if ever.
 
Last edited:

BeerIsNotGood...

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
8,606
personally, I'd like a state structure that rotated roles amongst the best of its people bearing in mind their ability and skills, and capped salaries dramatically, rather than what we have. which is a popularity contest, with the promise of an infinitely expanding blank cheque (and the ability to auction off communal assets) going to the winner.

but we're very far from that, if ever.
Limited government based on lite technocracy/meritocracy for me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top