South African Covid-19 News and Discussions 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,105
Rt is supposed to be an average measure of all past infections, and independent of the transmission mechanism(s). Clusters, travel-restrictions, lockdowns, schools, and masks are all relevant factors, but not directly related to the total numbers.

Rt is simply R0 multiplied by the fraction of the population that is susceptible. So my guess is while the daily number has stayed somewhat the same, there was a change in the number of susceptible people in Cpt.
Maybe they also calculate it by taking Cpt's R0 multiplied by the whole of SA's susceptible population, then infections in other provinces would have an influence as well.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Rt is simply R0 multiplied by the fraction of the population that is susceptible. So my guess is while the daily number has stayed somewhat the same, there was a change in the number of susceptible people in Cpt.
Maybe they also calculate it by taking Cpt's R0 multiplied by the whole of SA's susceptible population, then infections in other provinces would have an influence as well.
I have had detailed feedback from the team supporting media hack, and the wild increase in the Rt value as reflected on the plot ( beta dashboard for WC) from about 0.8 or so to 1.16 is two-fold.

1. The missing data for the 19th, which appears to have been included in the data for the 21st.
2. The second is the updating cycles used by media hack. They do not necessarily run updates every 24 hours.

The alternative source:


is updated more regularly and hence does not show this sharp change in values.

Once again illustrates the point I have made many times over. It is not useful at all to jump to any conclusions based on the data available in SA. There are just too many data integrity issues with the data publically available.

If you work through the maths, the sensitivities of the results to accurate and timeous data are quite large, especially the last few days.
It means in the WC media hack plot as it stands at 1.16 on the 25th is pretty meaningless at the moment with the last accurate ones being those calculated before the 18th July.

The above link also provides an estimate of the number of persons considered to be infectious in SA and for each province.
 
Last edited:

Gordon_R

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
20,817
Rt is simply R0 multiplied by the fraction of the population that is susceptible. So my guess is while the daily number has stayed somewhat the same, there was a change in the number of susceptible people in Cpt.
Maybe they also calculate it by taking Cpt's R0 multiplied by the whole of SA's susceptible population, then infections in other provinces would have an influence as well.

Calculating a proper number for Rt is much, much harder than it looks. We know that testing in SA is neither random, nor consistent, and misses about 90% of all infections. Proper estimation in such a scenario involves looking both at new test cases, as well as deaths, and modelling the underlying number of infections based on various assumptions.

I have had detailed feedback from the team supporting media hack, and the wild increase in the Rt value as reflected on the plot ( beta dashboard for WC) form about 0.8 or so to 1.16 is two-fold.

1. The missing data for the 19th, which appears to have been included in the data for the 21st.
2. The second is the updating cycles used by media hack. They do not necessarily run updates very 24 hours.

The alternative source:


is updated more regularly and hence does not show this sharp change in values.

Once again illustrates the point I have made many times over. It is not useful at all to jump to any conclusions based on the data available in SA. There are just too many data integrity issues with the data publically available.

If you work through the maths, the sensitivities of the results to accurate and timeous data are quite large, especially the last few days.
It means in the WC media hack plot as it stands at 1.16 on the 25th is pretty meaningless at the moment with the last accurate ones being those calculated before the 18th July.

Thanks for investigating. Noise in data takes many forms, and what you found is all part of what I was referring to.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,700
Some newly updated regulations from the tourism briefing:

> Curfew moved to 10pm
> Intra-provincial (travel within a province) is allowed for leisure purposes.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Some newly updated regulations from the tourism briefing:

> Curfew moved to 10pm
> Intra-provincial (travel within a province) is allowed for leisure purposes.
Still fiddling are they? The curfew should be something like 10 for restaurants to close, and 11 for staff to get home if they want to play these silly games.

Better than nothing I suppose.
 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
47,671
Brilliant - so you can meet up with family somewhere in your province, stay overnight.... but you still can't just visit them in their own homes. :rolleyes:
 

BBSA

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
21,905
"Accommodation establishments are now permitted to operate for leisure intra-provincially subject to not having more than two people per room except for a nuclear family (parents and their children). Establishments are already legally obliged to require and keep a copy of proof of identity," she revealed.
 

Brawler

Honorary Master
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
11,472
I thought intra-provincial leisure travel was already allowed? Or was it rescinded?
I've been all over the place and even stopped at a roadblock. All the cops were interested in was booze.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,982
I've been all over as well and never been stopped. The only thing really locked down is smokes and booze :(. In reality things look like they were just getting back
 

Nirv

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
938
Has anyone here crossed provincial borders and experienced any potential problems when doing so?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top