Every single country rolling out Vaccines are doing this. As a result of this the UK government has discovered that the Pfizer Vaccines takes 2 weeks do be effective and after 3 weeks it's 90% effective. I think they are only administering the 2nd dose after 2 months
Or all the hand sanitizing has created hardier stomach bugs? Or it's wiped out our bodies way of fighting off little bugs as we over sanitize.My GP (in Century City) says 30 to 40% of the cases they are seeing now are gastro related, and initially they were sending people for covid testing as their patients were exhibiting diarrhea, nausea, headaches and vomiting, but then they stopped as the tests were coming back negative. By the sounds of it gastro viruses are hardier than the coronavirus and it hand sanitizer alone won't do the trick for them, so perhaps there's such a high prevalence of this now as all the hand sanitizer is giving people a false sense of security. I think my old man caught this and in combination with a bladder infection, for a few days he felt so ill he just wanted to die
You're missing my point. I'm not challenging the vaccines and I'm not even challenging the trials. What I'm challenging is that these global in-vivo trials are put forward as the finished thing. THE vaccine. The fact that the UK government only found the best way to use it later on and the fact that SA govt found the AZ not as suitable AFTER receiving delivery proves my case in point.
That would mean delaying Vaccine rollout by years if done the traditional way
So has this thing been tested? Has it not? Short term? Long term? Not sure?
If it's being rolled out in full then my definition it is not a trial. I don't know what you going on about about "final product". This is the "final product", any tweaks to the vaccine will result in a brand new "product" which then will have to back down to phase 1 trials.
Why are we still testing? To confirm that it is safe and effective? Why are we testing for 2 years? To confirm it is safe and effective long term?
For comparing real world data to trial data.
You should try read the arguments in favour of IVM as a covid treatment sometime.
I'm not defending that one either. Actually everyone has a free choice. IVM, vaccines, no vaccines. As long as they make an informed decision based on facts, not marketing or hype (that goes for IVM and no-vaxx too).
You do know that all the media does hype for a living ?
Exactly, so why all the ranting about it?
OK i should have said that I googled it, but I didn't want to be that guy. Apparently gastro type viruses are faily resilient against alcohol based hand sanitisers.
www.nbcnews.com
Gloves? Whatever for? They're wearing masks. That's the cure-all for everything. Heck, the one has a mask, a plastic anti-spatter shield and a doek. Old whatshername from the communist control committee must be her hero.
In fact, I am very concerned by people wearing gloves. If they don't change those gloves with every patient, then one has to wonder where those gloves have been?
Sign up with Google