South African Covid-19 News and Discussions 3

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,460
Ja if I understood the prof correctly, that is exactly what is implied.
Has that not always been the case? I have seen the 10x actual cases estimation over and over again, cases mild or asymptomatic.

Ref 7
It was asked before, but how have lockdowns, social distancing and masking been so "effective" against flu (think compliance), while at the same time so ineffective against covid.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,971
So what I've noticed is this thread has been going since September 2020, that's 8 months, the last 2 were done in a couple of months. So news slowing down? Apathy setting in?
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
The 1 confirmed case versus 9 not known is the disturbing aspect. Someone should correlate that with the differences between actual confirmed covid death figures and the excess death figures.
Then the issue about early infection providing little or no protection against reinfection by variants.
How does that correlate with the efficacy claims made about the vaccines?
Something ain't quite right here.
I have not seen any stats anywhere about the numbers of people that have been infected more than once. All we see is talk of "deduplicated" data. Is that measure not hiding something, where reinfection data is lost in the belief that people can't be infected more than once?
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,356
I have not seen any stats anywhere about the numbers of people that have been infected more than once. All we see is talk of "deduplicated" data. Is that measure not hiding something, where reinfection data is lost in the belief that people can't be infected more than once?
Yeah. If you get covid, you're only immune for three months afterwards.

Or, maybe science?

Immunity to the Coronavirus May Persist for Years, Scientists Find​

Important immune cells survive in the bone marrow of people who were infected with the virus or were inoculated against it, new research suggests
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,971
The 1 confirmed case versus 9 not known is the disturbing aspect. Someone should correlate that with the differences between actual confirmed covid death figures and the excess death figures.
Then the issue about early infection providing little or no protection against reinfection by variants.
How does that correlate with the efficacy claims made about the vaccines?
Something ain't quite right here.
I have not seen any stats anywhere about the numbers of people that have been infected more than once. All we see is talk of "deduplicated" data. Is that measure not hiding something, where reinfection data is lost in the belief that people can't be infected more than once?
All the numbers are horrible, as I've gone on my high horse about, we can't keep counting these things daily. It doesn't achieve anything.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Today, for the first time since this whole drama started, we were confronted by a person clearly overweight, having serious breathing problems and a terrible hacking cough , wearing a mask but in the medicine queue at Dischem.
We were decidedly uncomfortable about it.
It made me wonder about the circumstances that led to this poor person having to collect their own medication when they should have been at home and in bed if not already in health care somewhere.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,971
Today, for the first time since this whole drama started, we were confronted by a person clearly overweight, having serious breathing problems and a terrible hacking cough , wearing a mask but in the medicine queue at Dischem.
We were decidedly uncomfortable about it.
It made me wonder about the circumstances that led to this poor person having to collect their own medication when they should have been at home and in bed if not already in health care somewhere.
More then likely the stupid delivery system. Even with the 2 scares we've had, we struggled to get them to deliver pmb meds.
 

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,460
Today, for the first time since this whole drama started, we were confronted by a person clearly overweight, having serious breathing problems and a terrible hacking cough , wearing a mask but in the medicine queue at Dischem.
We were decidedly uncomfortable about it.
It made me wonder about the circumstances that led to this poor person having to collect their own medication when they should have been at home and in bed if not already in health care somewhere.
Yet a year ago, you would not have bet an eyelid and thought about some person with cough standing right next to you
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Yet a year ago, you would not have bet an eyelid and thought about some person with cough standing right next to you
No, you are right, we were too wrapped up in our own lives to care very much. This mess has made us far more sensitive to the screwings and doings of others.
 

Brawler

Honorary Master
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
11,472
I have not seen any stats anywhere about the numbers of people that have been infected more than once. All we see is talk of "deduplicated" data. Is that measure not hiding something, where reinfection data is lost in the belief that people can't be infected more than once?
The western cape dashboard shows reinfections.
1622235901292.png
 

flytek

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
1,745
Reinfections at around one percent could just as easily be false positives the first or second time? Either way it seems minor. Does it not also mean that prior infection may provide protection against severe illness, hospitalisation or death from covid much like the vaccines claim to do?
May places with high seroprevalence be effectively protected altogether? Perhaps vaccines are unecessary once a population has a certain seroprevalence level? Imagine that.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Reinfections at around one percent could just as easily be false positives the first or second time? Either way it seems minor. Does it not also mean that prior infection may provide protection against severe illness, hospitalisation or death from covid much like the vaccines claim to do?
May places with high seroprevalence be effectively protected altogether? Perhaps vaccines are unecessary once a population has a certain seroprevalence level? Imagine that.
Not if you accept what the prof said this week about the very high levels of antibodies in the population, and still the variants are able still infect and be equally dangerous.
This makes me question the figures we have been given about the efficacy and effectiveness of the vaccines against the variants.
Personally, I think the authorities are clutching at straws, hoping like hell that the vaccines are going to deliver.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Has the UK not displayed a massive drop in deaths after mass vaccination? :unsure:
Too early to say so conclusively. The evidence to support effectiveness against new emerging variants is just non existent at this stage.
 

Mortymoose

Honorary Master
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
13,287
Too early to say so conclusively. The evidence to support effectiveness against new emerging variants is just non existent at this stage.

Agreed! Early days still, must say that al the folk up here that I know (which numbers in the 100's) that have had the vaccine, all were very nervous and scared, but afterwards, their mental wellbeing improved knowing that this might work...... at least there was a sense of hope.........
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Agreed! Early days still, must say that al the folk up here that I know (which numbers in the 100's) that have had the vaccine, all were very nervous and scared, but afterwards, their mental wellbeing improved knowing that this might work...... at least there was a sense of hope.........
Provided none of them relax their vigilance and precautions as a result.
Both my wife and I would get the jab. In my case the problem again confirmed by my doctor is the allergic reaction. He still maintains that I should not get the jab given our general risk profile
 
Top