South African Covid-19 News and Discussions 3

CataclysmZA

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
5,579
So we ok with Chinese and Russian vaccines? If memory serves me right...all countries mentioned are either going the Chinese or Russian route...
I will certainly not be taking any vaccine produced in Russia or China.

Amazing to see people say they won't take these vaccines without knowing the details of their efficacy and study results.

Russia's main vaccine was developed by the Gamaleya Institute and is a combination of adenoviruses that hosts inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus, that work together to ensure that the immune system creates antibodies and doesn't try to fight the vaccine itself. Efficacy is over 91%, and phase 1, 2, and 3 human trials went fairly well. No serious side effects have been found. A fourth trial of 31,000 participants is underway, but the vaccine is already available under an emergency rollout clause.

Gamaleya is recommending that their Sputnik-V vaccine be supplemented by the Oxford-Zeneca vaccine to cover any potential differences in spike proteins. Argentina has approved it for early use for first-line and healthcare workers. Another Russian-made vaccine, EpiVacCorona, is in phase 3 trials and targets spike proteins.

China has several vaccines in development both internally and outside the country, and in different trial stages. This includes Convidecia (by CanSino Biologics, unknown efficacy but trials will complete soon), BBIBP-CorV (by the Beijing Institute of Biological Products, 86% efficacy), CoronaVac by Sinovac Biotech (efficacy will be determined next month, will be sold to Indonesia and Ukraine), and Sinopharm's inactivated virus vaccine which is currently in phase 3 trials and has reported no serious side effects.

All these vaccines have passed their phase 1 and 2 trials, which means there are no serious side effects and they are all effective at producing an immune response.
 

MiW

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,313
Amazing to see people say they won't take these vaccines without knowing the details of their efficacy and study results.
That is exactly the problem, not knowing.
All these vaccines have passed their phase 1 and 2 trials, which means there are no serious side effects and they are all effective at producing an immune response.

This vaccines had trails in countries where medics are arrested , or fall of windows in large numbers. So no one will report any negative stats about them.
They might be even better than, pfizer, but how can anyone trust anything coming from Russian and Chinese governments?
 

yebocan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
14,008
Amazing to see people say they won't take these vaccines without knowing the details of their efficacy and study results.

Russia's main vaccine was developed by the Gamaleya Institute and is a combination of adenoviruses that hosts inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus, that work together to ensure that the immune system creates antibodies and doesn't try to fight the vaccine itself. Efficacy is over 91%, and phase 1, 2, and 3 human trials went fairly well. No serious side effects have been found. A fourth trial of 31,000 participants is underway, but the vaccine is already available under an emergency rollout clause.

Gamaleya is recommending that their Sputnik-V vaccine be supplemented by the Oxford-Zeneca vaccine to cover any potential differences in spike proteins. Argentina has approved it for early use for first-line and healthcare workers. Another Russian-made vaccine, EpiVacCorona, is in phase 3 trials and targets spike proteins.

China has several vaccines in development both internally and outside the country, and in different trial stages. This includes Convidecia (by CanSino Biologics, unknown efficacy but trials will complete soon), BBIBP-CorV (by the Beijing Institute of Biological Products, 86% efficacy), CoronaVac by Sinovac Biotech (efficacy will be determined next month, will be sold to Indonesia and Ukraine), and Sinopharm's inactivated virus vaccine which is currently in phase 3 trials and has reported no serious side effects.

All these vaccines have passed their phase 1 and 2 trials, which means there are no serious side effects and they are all effective at producing an immune response.

Thanks for the layout... the whole Corona shitfest is just too "clouded" for my liking... - not taking any vaccines related to it.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,695
Amazing to see people say they won't take these vaccines without knowing the details of their efficacy and study results.

Russia's main vaccine was developed by the Gamaleya Institute and is a combination of adenoviruses that hosts inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus, that work together to ensure that the immune system creates antibodies and doesn't try to fight the vaccine itself. Efficacy is over 91%, and phase 1, 2, and 3 human trials went fairly well. No serious side effects have been found. A fourth trial of 31,000 participants is underway, but the vaccine is already available under an emergency rollout clause.

Gamaleya is recommending that their Sputnik-V vaccine be supplemented by the Oxford-Zeneca vaccine to cover any potential differences in spike proteins. Argentina has approved it for early use for first-line and healthcare workers. Another Russian-made vaccine, EpiVacCorona, is in phase 3 trials and targets spike proteins.

China has several vaccines in development both internally and outside the country, and in different trial stages. This includes Convidecia (by CanSino Biologics, unknown efficacy but trials will complete soon), BBIBP-CorV (by the Beijing Institute of Biological Products, 86% efficacy), CoronaVac by Sinovac Biotech (efficacy will be determined next month, will be sold to Indonesia and Ukraine), and Sinopharm's inactivated virus vaccine which is currently in phase 3 trials and has reported no serious side effects.

All these vaccines have passed their phase 1 and 2 trials, which means there are no serious side effects and they are all effective at producing an immune response.

That's all nice and good but I don't you understand my principle objection - trust. I simply don't believe the stuff coming out of these countries. Remember Chernobyl was partially caused by the culture of the Soviet Union which encouraged cover ups and the like.
 

MiW

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,313
Amazing to see people say they won't take these vaccines without knowing the details of their efficacy and study results.

Russia's main vaccine was developed by the Gamaleya Institute and is a combination of adenoviruses that hosts inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus, that work together to ensure that the immune system creates antibodies and doesn't try to fight the vaccine itself. Efficacy is over 91%, and phase 1, 2, and 3 human trials went fairly well. No serious side effects have been found. A fourth trial of 31,000 participants is underway, but the vaccine is already available under an emergency rollout clause.

Gamaleya is recommending that their Sputnik-V vaccine be supplemented by the Oxford-Zeneca vaccine to cover any potential differences in spike proteins. Argentina has approved it for early use for first-line and healthcare workers. Another Russian-made vaccine, EpiVacCorona, is in phase 3 trials and targets spike proteins.

China has several vaccines in development both internally and outside the country, and in different trial stages. This includes Convidecia (by CanSino Biologics, unknown efficacy but trials will complete soon), BBIBP-CorV (by the Beijing Institute of Biological Products, 86% efficacy), CoronaVac by Sinovac Biotech (efficacy will be determined next month, will be sold to Indonesia and Ukraine), and Sinopharm's inactivated virus vaccine which is currently in phase 3 trials and has reported no serious side effects.

All these vaccines have passed their phase 1 and 2 trials, which means there are no serious side effects and they are all effective at producing an immune response.
2 hours ago (07:39 GMT)

China grants ‘conditional’ approval to its first COVID vaccine​


China has granted “conditional” market approval to a Sinopharm vaccine with a reported 79-percent efficacy, health authorities said on Thursday, a major stride towards inoculating the world’s largest population.


The Sinopharm jab, which surged ahead of a raft of Chinese competitors during phase-three trials, has an efficacy rate lower than rival jabs developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna – with 95 and 94 percent rates respectively.


About 4.5 million doses of largely unproven emergency vaccines made domestically have already been given to health workers and other workers destined for overseas jobs, according to authorities.
 

CataclysmZA

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
5,579
They might be even better than, pfizer, but how can anyone trust anything coming from Russian and Chinese governments?

Many of the vaccines have publicly available results from their studies that you can read. Several of the vaccine trials in other countries also publish their results, so you can take multiple studies of the same thing into account if need be.

For example, BBIBP-CorV's trial in China showed efficacy of around 79%, but a trial for the same vaccine run by the UAE with 31,000 respondents showed a higher efficacy of 86%.


You can see more details here, if you open this link in an InPrivate or Incognito window: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html
 

andydinsmore

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2015
Messages
122
As is this Israeli / Swiss victim.
Do not take this vaccine.
 

Azg

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
3,213
Does anyone remembers what SA needed to pay for the vaccines for 3-10% of the population? AZ vaccine comes to around R50 a shot, and I have the feeling we will be paying ridiculously inflated prices.
$128 million (approx R2 billion) to cover 10% of the population.

The 15% down payment which has caused so much noise was $19.2 million.
 

MiW

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,313
$128 million (approx R2 billion) to cover 10% of the population.

The 15% down payment which has caused so much noise was $19.2 million.
so around R300 per person :unsure:
To much for AZ , to little for pfizer
 

zoozi

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
1,768
Looking more and more like Tiffany Dover, the hot Stateside nurse who fainted on live TV after recieving the 'vaccine', is now dead.

 

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
60,615
I believe they are looking at it - wasn’t minister of health quoted as saying we have manufacturing capabilities here too?

honestly I think COVAX is also a bit of a “we better do this to look like we’re supporting WHO and playing well with the others” move. There are other plans in progress in govt and private sector and a combo of the two.
Aspen will be manufacturing locally on behalf of Janssen / Johnson and Johnson
 

neoprema

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
10,820
...and will take them a year to start production line
I believe they already have the production line. But only for "normal" vaccines not the fancy Pfizer/Moderna ones. So the Oxford one I believe (stand corrected) we could produce here?
 

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
60,615
Ok thanks for the information - I thought given the proximity to the US - the storage requirements not withstanding - they would be administering the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. I will certainly not be taking any vaccine produced in Russia or China.

The Oxford vaccine looks most promising for us in SA in terms of cost and storage requirements.
I think the Johnson & Johnson one may be better in that it is a single dose.
Not sure of the costing comparison, but a single dose vaccine would be easier to roll out given the demographics and state of healthcare in this country
 

neoprema

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
10,820
As is this Israeli / Swiss victim.
Do not take this vaccine.
There are people who had bad side effects from Polio vaccines too. Should we re-introduce Polio and stop vaccinations? There's always a small % of risk in any vaccine. It should not excuse the 99% who will benefit from it. Also, people have a choice not to accept it if they feel the vaccine poses a higher risk than COVID-19, but lets not Karen-ize what is a very good vaccine considering the time it took to make it.
 

MiW

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,313
They will be using their existing facility in Port Elizabeth
Yes, in some news article it said will take them a year to start production.J&J tried with single dose and it seems that they didn't like the results much , so Dec they started a new trial in USA with double dose ... if I remember correctly.
 
Top