saffakanera
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,370
UK are handling this situation like idiots.UK death rate is very high, and they've had universal BCG vaccination since 1953.
UK are handling this situation like idiots.UK death rate is very high, and they've had universal BCG vaccination since 1953.
They stopped in 2005, also the vaccine only has efficacy for 15 years anywayUK death rate is very high, and they've had universal BCG vaccination since 1953.
If the vaccine was protecting for 60 years SA wouldn't have any TB left
They stopped in 2005, also the vaccine only has efficacy for 15 years anyway
I've never known anyone with it.Logic fail.
The problem with TB in South Africa has little to do with declining efficacy of the BCG vaccine. It has a lot to do with socio-economic deprivation, chronic alcoholism, and HIV, leading to depressed immune systems.
I am fortunate that I do not know anyone in my socio-economic group ever infected with TB. I do know two in a lower socio-economic group who did have it: one died, one recovered. Both were car guards. Draw your own conclusions...
Yes, what exactly make you think that I missed that point? Or you also just like to post for the sake of posting.And again, it is NOT about total prevention, that requires a vaccine. It is about what role BCG could possibly be playing in reducing the severity of Covid 19, or improving the body's chance of developing anti-bodies sooner and even could mean why more people in SA are asymptotic.
I've never known anyone with it.
Possibly why than.TB is much more prevalent in the Western Cape, for various reasons, including the cold and wet winters, and high rate of chronic alcoholism.
True, but South Africa doesn't have to do any trials, because 80-90% of the population was vaccinated at birth...
If the trials demonstrate the vaccine is effective we'll be smiling.
Depends which country you were born. But also take into account kids are immunised for various diseases normally until school going age. It could have been administered at a later stage, if not at birth.If you were born before 1973 you would not have received the vaccine, either way less people to vaccinate.
Depends which country you were born. But also take into account kids are immunised for various diseases normally until school going age. It could have been administered at a later stage, if not at birth.
Talking about SA births.
If you were born before 1973 you would not have received the vaccine, either way less people to vaccinate.
Well...that's not surprising in the least.Vaccine trials are not universally welcome:
![]()
Apology to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for 'Africa vaccine' story
News24 unreservedly apologises to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for falsely reporting that they want to test a vaccine for coronavirus in Africa.www.news24.com
Why do you think the vaccine was not used before 1973?
In South Africa, universal BCG vaccination of infants at birth was implemented in 1973.
BCG has been used in South Africa since 1973.
But very disappointing never the less.
A typical reaction driven by fear, suspicion and superstition.