Soylent crowdfunding campaign attracts $755K so people can survive without food

FlatspinZA

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
1,630
6,144 people are willing to live without food.

The crowdfunding campaign for Soylent raked in $754,498, greatly exceeding its $100,000 goal and bringing humanity one step closer to an existence that doesn’t require actual food for survival.

Soylent is a controversial food replacement product that allegedly contains all the nutrients humans need to survive. The powder is made up of the basic-building blocks of nutrition, including maltodextrin and oat powder for carbs, whey isolate for protein, ferrous gluconate for iron, grape seed oil for fat, creatine, and other ingredients.

“This started out as an experiment,” said founder Rob Rhinehart. I was freshly graduated, working on a startup and living off ramen and quesadillas. I didn’t have the time, energy, or motivation to eat well, but my diet was harming my health and that harmed my productivity. It was really frustrating and I thought there had to be a more efficient way to get the nutrients we need.”

979974_569962329702201_203668434_oRhinehart said it only took a bit of research and elementary chemistry to create the first batch of the mixture, which he has tweaked over time. He has been living exclusively on Soylent for about five months now and said he has never felt better in his life. His bloodwork is excellent, he is maintaining a healthy weight for his height, and he has plenty of energy. He even runs frequently.

Once he trusted that the Soylent lifestyle was safe, Rhinehart created a crowdfunding campaign to make “the future of nutrition” available to a wider community. He reached the funding goal in under 3 hours and every additional dollar will go towards improving the formulation, manufacture, and distribution of the product.

Soylent is generating a lot of excitement in the startup community, amongst people who find feeding themselves a hassle or a distraction from work or who are into the idea “body hacking.” While the ability to be optimally nourished with minimal effort is well-suited to the entrepreneurial lifestyle, Rhinehart’s ultimate goal is to make nutrition more accessible to people who genuinely don’t have access to nutritious food.

“Income makes a huge difference in people’s health and lifestyle,” Rhinehart said. “It’s not fair that people with higher income can afford Whole Foods while people in lower-end areas mainly have access to fast food and junk. I resented that. People are nutrient deficient in the U.S., even if they aren’t starving, and this is about restoring balance.”

Seventy percent of Americans are overweight or obese, one in seven people globally are malnourished, and one in three in the developing world suffer from deficiency. Furthermore, Rhinehart said that “countless” others are living hand-to-mouth, which hinders their ability for economic development. Soylent could change that by alleviating hunger and malnutrition at a low cost. There are potential environmental benefits as well. A recent report published in the Guardian found that as much as half of the world’s food is wasted every year – that is the equivalent of 2 billion tons of food that ends up in the trash. Soylent would not only cut down on that waste, but also on the harmful effects of agriculture, livestock, and food processing.

It sounds too good to be true, and people (present company included) are understandably skeptical of a super-powder that solves all these issues. The Washington Post interviewed nutrition expert Jay Mirtallo who said that it is “completely” possible to live a healthy life by subsisting off “medical food.” The real question is, would you want to?

For many of us, food is a pleasure rather than a hassle, and so much of our social lives revolve around coming together over meals. Rhinehart said that Soylent is not about replacing food altogether — rather it’s meant to replace the crap or processed food we eat when we are too busy to toss up a farm-fresh salad.

“Soylent is about enjoying food more” he said. “For most people, this will be a subset of their meals. You should still enjoy social eating in restaurants, cooking, and indulging in all your favorite foods, but food can be something that is purely for fun and leisure. I don’t hate food, I just think we could do better by innovating in food a little bit.”

Food is such a basic part of human existence that the idea of innovating on it seems odd. When I think of “food innovation,” I think of muscleman nutrition supplements, processed foods, or genetically modified foods — none of which I consider healthy or appealing. Rhinehart said that the food industry has applied technology in ways that aren’t beneficial to our bodies, but this doesn’t have to be the case.

“Food does not have to be natural to be healthy,” he said. “Processing is a useful innovation that has been misused. You can use it to make food look more appetizing or addictive, or you can use it to make something that is quite healthy. People are understandably conservative about their food. Natural organic food has its place, but at the end of the day, all foods and flavors are made out of chemicals, and we can engineer those to make better food than nature has.”

Rhinehart has no formal background in food science. He is a software engineer who went through the summer 2012 Y Combinator batch to build affordable wireless networks for developing countries. While going through YC, the founders were working around-the-clock, and he thought that what people really need are better ways to stay nourished. YC founder Paul Graham called it the “biggest pivot in YC history,” and now the project is off and running.

Not that I am keen on giving up pork chops & mashed potatoes, but this looks like a viable solution to providing nutrition to those that cannot afford it.

Sauce
 
Last edited:

TJ99

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
10,737
Source please.

Also, don't they know that Soylent Green is PEOPLE?
 

Komrun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
175
It’s not fair that people with higher income can afford Whole Foods while people in lower-end areas mainly have access to fast food and junk

And exactly how a ridiculously expensive product might help eliminate this problem?
 
P

Picard

Guest
I can see this working.

Although it doesn't fill up your stomach like a proper meal ... three times a day ... you still go ahead and stuff yourself with cheap carbohidrates in the evenings, go to sleep with a full stomach ... and wake up the next day, healthy and well-fed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

chrisc

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
11,279
Sounds a bit boring to me. A portion of good eating is choosing and preparing the food. This sounds like stuff out of a factory, like dreadful American cheese with no flavour and the texture of cardboard
 

bdt

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
7,001
It's not about effort, it's about the OP committing plagiarism.
pla·gia·rism [pley-juh-riz-uhm, -jee-uh-riz-]
noun
1. an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author.

Sorry, but as OP isn't claiming the content as his own I can't see how he would be; at worst he was [-]too bone arse lazy[/-] remiss in failing to provide a source link. Which really isn't THAT big of a deal.
 
P

Picard

Guest
Sounds a bit boring to me. A portion of good eating is choosing and preparing the food. This sounds like stuff out of a factory, like dreadful American cheese with no flavour and the texture of cardboard

Good ****!!!

Have you ever been hungry?

Have you ever been starving?

I can promise you ... if you've ever been at the stage of starvation you would'nt give a **** about French cuisine like you obviously have at the forefront of your mind.
 

TJ99

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
10,737
pla·gia·rism [pley-juh-riz-uhm, -jee-uh-riz-]
noun
1. an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author.

Sorry, but as OP isn't claiming the content as his own I can't see how he would be; at worst he was [-]too bone arse lazy[/-] remiss in failing to provide a source link. Which really isn't THAT big of a deal.

It isn't, which is why I asked him nicely to add a source. If it WAS a big deal, I'd have reported it instead.

By the way, read the rest of your own definition, "as by not crediting the original author". He didn't credit the original author.
 

FlatspinZA

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
1,630
Source please.

Also, don't they know that Soylent Green is PEOPLE?

Sorry, I fixed my original post - it was Venture Beat.

BTW: I normally provide some sauce, but I got distracted, so I served it dry. :p
 
Last edited:

Zewp

Banned
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
10,655
It isn't, which is why I asked him nicely to add a source. If it WAS a big deal, I'd have reported it instead.

By the way, read the rest of your own definition, "as by not crediting the original author". He didn't credit the original author.

I'm pretty sure the fact that the OP put the entire thing in quote tags implies that it is not his own work.

When someone posts a picture without a link to its source we don't automatically assume he created the picture.
 
Last edited:

Cube3

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
1,341
This stuff makes me think of any gym supplement MRP sachet.....

However if there was the perfect meal in a packet, I would just live off those.....

What about different dietary requirements ? The current USDA food pyramid isn't exactly popular lately.
 

TehStranger

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
6,088
Ironic name.

I could see how this would be amazing if it comes in at a low price making it widely accessible. I would hit that in the mornings and afternoons, leaving snacks and dinner to real food.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,177
There's something awful and something wonderful about this idea; at the same time. Not that it's a particularly original idea; even the name references the fact that sci-fi authors have speculated about it for years; but of course it would take a Y-Combinator tech brat Zuckerberg wannabe to make it happen.

Nightmare scenario: Production of Soylent causes human population explosion. 'Normal' food prices hyperinflate so that only the wealthiest can afford non-synthetic foods. Etc.
 
Last edited:

Keeper

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
23,624
What a name :p

Whats the difference of this and any other powdered nutrition products though?

another thing - don't poor people already have mealie meal/rice/etc ?
 
Top