- Nov 1, 2006
Any effect on the SKA?
See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
I think that's due to the brief moments where no satellites are available for handover. It seems to be enough time to give problems for video calls/calls/live streaming, but if you do something that uses a buffer you won't notice it. Should be fixed when more satellites are up. And I think the current performance will greatly depend on your location and the density of the satellites over the area.I watch a streamer that is in rural Canada, he just got Starlink. Constant drops. He returned to LTE to stream. So who knows.
If the Ku band is already being used by other sat systems will GSs ever happen in SA?The GS communicate with the SATs in the bog standard Ku band already used by sat systems.
GS approvals are not that difficult for those holding the correct service licences and after paying the spectrum fees.
The issue in SA is the use of the sat-to-terminal frequency band
The Ku band GS to Sat is a coordinated band so generally, not an issue for interference.If the Ku band is already being used by other sat systems will GSs ever happen in SA?
is that sat-to-terminal frequency band currently saturated in SA? or is the real issue here that the right hands would need to be rubbed to get approval for use of that band?
I've been reading up that starlink sats are to operate in the Ku and Ka bands? i'm not too clued up on all of this but I'm sure that's a lot of Bandwidth to have multiple operators in the same bands?
Not sure what you're on about.Highest speed and lowest latency globally. Enough said.
PS: Not even all the satellites are launched yet, and still out performs anything currently available.
Not sure what you're on about.
40Gbps is mainstream - yeah you won't see it on speedtests, but it is. In fact, that's not even the fastest we can go.
Also not sure how Starlink is the fastest speed? There 10Gbps speedtests out there, let alone 1Gbps which is already decent for the average home user.
Until there are actual physical tests done it's all just pissing in the wind.30ms is local speedtest currently. Local meaning US user to US server or Canada user to Canadian server or UK user to UK server.
We are connected via fibre optic on the planet itself and we get 160ms, maybe 140ms is possible from CPT to EU if very very lucky.
I don't see how bouncing packets into LEO and then transmitting that via lazer higher up and back down to ground stations will improve much, if anything, over what we currently have.
The ONLY advantage Starlink and similar services aim to have is ubiquitous service all over. Giving fibre-like experience at best, but likely with slightly higher latency than terrestrial fibre.
That simply means we will have many more farm boys and so on potentially playing on EU servers - or even just joining local servers because rural areas or not well served.
Even then, most of those folk are too busy to be playing around on computers. Most of them use it for business.
I'm sure by the time they launch here they will have some local ground stations in operation. When they started offering services in Australia ground stations seemed to be established quickly.Physical tests done IN South Africa with no local GSs available.
Those of you with fibre, can basically ignore starlink.
Those of us with no other options other than LTE or Fixed Wifi will be happy.
There are a lot of us in the latter segment.
Not reliability but availability of capacity. Starlink is just another last mile technology offering that ensures ubiquitous coverage unfettered by geographical constraints.Another thing I missed was that they are 5 launches away from full global coverage in phase 1. Any launches after that will be to increase reliability and eventually to launch version 2 of the satellites with the 'space lasers'.
Really an interesting development to keep an eye on.