Sri Lankan criket team attacked in Pakistan

Biggie

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
734
It's astonishing people can consider that India would attack the Sri Lankan cricket team for 'revenge' on Pakistan for the attack on Mumbai and get away with it. Even the Tamil Tiger theory is more plausible.
Their beef is not with Sri Lanka,why do you think everybody in that bus is still alive.They wanted to create a situation in which decisions would be made that'll hurt Pakistan big time.The Sri Lanka team is just the much needed pions in it all.They were not spesifically targeted,any intl team would be good.

There you have it,a revenge attack with limited loss of life.

It's my opinion,it sounds more logic to me than a Tamil tiger attack
 
Last edited:

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Are you referring to the World Trade Center attacks? How did the CIA "drop" the WTC?

Did you not see the planes hit? Then the witnesses who say they heard loud explosions from the bottom?

No ways those planes made them both drop like that, surely you okes know those planes never dropped them?
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
Did you not see the planes hit? Then the witnesses who say they heard loud explosions from the bottom?

No ways those planes made them both drop like that, surely you okes know those planes never dropped them?

OK, you just dropped about 1000 levels of intelligence in my estimation. :rolleyes:
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Gary i don't get something you know i blame the US for the WTC surely i would dropped those levels long ago :p

Let's just say the only reason bush got a second term was WTC bombing :)
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
Gary i don't get something you know i blame the US for the WTC surely i would dropped those levels long ago :p

Let's just say the only reason bush got a second term was WTC bombing :)

You don't think that after 8 years and in one of the most free countries in the world that one slight little bit of shred of evidence would have shown up? That not one senator or senior public official would have got on board with this ridiculous theory? that not one person in the CIA or FBI or whatever else would have blown the whistle? Sure there are some peculiarities in what happened that day... nobody expected the towers to fall in that way, but then nobody had ever flown a fully fuel-laden plane into a tower like that before. You say there were "explosions" at the bottom of the towers? have you ever heard ten-inch steel girders snap and break?

nah... I'm sorry... anybody who believes that crack-pot theory has to be several sandwiches short of a picnic basket. You don't think the democrats would have picked up on that and used it against the Republicans?

You need to see a psychiatrist, dude.
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
I could understand one building falling that way but explain 2 falling the same way with different hits in different places lol, yes i guess i am the only who thinks a 1 building would not fall that way let alone 2 building fall in almost an identical manner.

Naaaa i think people who believe 2 building falling like that is natural need the help :), one yes you could say ok who knows but 2???? Those towers where built to with stand an earth quake yet neither one of them could with stand a plane strike and then fall in a way that nobody can explain and the only way you can explain it is that we do not know they would fall with a fully fueled airplane. Guess people with degree's in physics and what not can not explain it yet you think your so clever and that 2 buildings would react in that manner :p

2 buildings gary, wow yes i must be the idiot here bwhahahaha.
 
Last edited:

manesan

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
923
Gary i don't get something you know i blame the US for the WTC surely i would dropped those levels long ago :p

Let's just say the only reason bush got a second term was WTC bombing :)

LOL ... Are you serious or just messing around?
 

Kosmik

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
25,730
This thread is on a permanent de-railment path. Guys lets try and stick to the topic .... crackpots included.
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
I could understand one building falling that way but explain 2 falling the same way with different hits in different places lol, yes i guess i am the only who thinks a 1 building would not fall that way let alone 2 building fall in almost an identical manner.

Naaaa i think people who believe 2 building falling like that is natural need the help :), one yes you could say ok who knows but 2????

so, you say there were explosions heard at the bottom of the towers... then how come they fell from the top down. Even your own crazy theory does not make sense. :rolleyes:

People who believe this idiocy need to be locked away for their own good! :eek:
 

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
49,503
so, you say there were explosions heard at the bottom of the towers... then how come they fell from the top down. Even your own crazy theory does not make sense. :rolleyes:

People who believe this idiocy need to be locked away for their own good! :eek:
And for the good of every normal human.
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Then, later, the second building suddenly crumbles into dust, in a smooth wave running from the top of the building (above the burned part) down through all the stories at an equal speed. The debris falls primarily inward. The tower does not break off intact and collapse into other buildings. ... The crumbling comes from the top (above the damage). It moves at a uniform rate. All of the structural members are destroyed in a smooth pattern, so there is no remaining skeleton. The damage is uniform, symmetric, and total.

In summary, it looks exactly like a demolition — because that's what it is.

Well gary now show me that i am indeed wrong and show me an explanation for the demolition not the collapse, they both went the same way. In your world a coincidence in my world a demolition.

although you guys are right we have derailed this thread again.

Back on track guys come on now :)
 

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
49,503
Killa, your nick says a lot :D you must have smoked some killaaaaa Doooob.

Then, later, the second building suddenly crumbles into dust, in a smooth wave running from the top of the building (above the burned part) down through all the stories at an equal speed. The debris falls primarily inward. The tower does not break off intact and collapse into other buildings. ... The crumbling comes from the top (above the damage). It moves at a uniform rate. All of the structural members are destroyed in a smooth pattern, so there is no remaining skeleton. The damage is uniform, symmetric, and total.

In summary, it looks exactly like a demolition — because that's what it is.

Well gary now show me that i am indeed wrong and show me an explanation for the demolition not the collapse, show me evidence or anything suggesting both towers went the same way.

although you guys are rightwe have derailed this thread again.

Back on track guys come on now :)
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
Nuh uh... you are the one making the crazy assumptions... YOU prove it. Prove the CIA was involved please.

I'm not playing your stupid schizo paranoid games.

ON Topic again... CNN says the gunmen are still at large. But more and more the attack is being compared to the Mumbai attacks in terms of planning.
 

JK8

Banned
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
14,105
Nuh uh... you are the one making the crazy assumptions... YOU prove it. Prove the CIA was involved please.

I'm not playing your stupid schizo paranoid games.

ON Topic again... CNN says the gunmen are still at large. But more and more the attack is being compared to the Mumbai attacks in terms of planning.

Go argue in my other thread where all the tapes were destroyed.

Back on topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They comparing it based on what? "Military precision?"
Next CNN will blame Al Queda, Lol I cant wait for that one!!
 

Frankie

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
5,785
Last edited:

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
Sky correspondent Alex Crawford said: "Our police sources are telling us there had been a threat that the Sri Lankan team may be attacked. That came on Monday and a different route was taken.

"But that seemed to make no difference. It was a sophisticated attack, which the Punjab governor is likening to the attack seen in Mumbai in India."

There were local reports that four people had been arrested. "Two of the suspects were armed," resident Adnam Ali told Sky News.

SKY
 

Morgoth

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
7,009
You got to hate the christian imperialistic western world for demonizing islam, this is their consequences.
 
Top