- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Messages
- 66,740
"Lyndall's interference in cables has been a disaster," Smuts says.
Now, picture the situation if Seacom or EASSY were faced by demands from all landing countries that they should have a majority equity stake in the cable?
Anyone that was wondering if Infraco might actually be good for SA, should now be able to see that in the hands of guavamint, Infraco is being used by the Grim Poisonous Ivyness Creep and bandwidth-Nazi-Shope-Mafole to create yet another monopoly...
Anyone that was wondering if Infraco might actually be good for SA, should now be able to see that in the hands of guavamint, Infraco is being used by the Grim Poisonous Ivyness Creep and bandwidth-Nazi-Shope-Mafole to create yet another monopoly...
Monopolies For Africa!
I get the distinct impression that Poison Ivy & Shope-Mafole are dictating what happens with Infraco and how Infraco will be run - before long Alec will wake up to find that his entire ministry has been monopolised by some Ivy-monster that looks like a gigantic stale doughnut.Not PI, Big Ears!
What part of "look like me" don't you people understand?
They are changing the rules to suite themselves as they go along
They do not know what they will do tomorrow, or next year for that matter. There is no structure, strategy or even direction. Bunch of buffoons trying to do a job that they clearly are not capable of doing.
Just bumbling along from one blunder to the next. Erwin/Infraco are powerless. What was going to be real competition has now again morphed into a state controlled get rich quick BEE (more than likely) venture.
So as the public we can all expect more of the same type of agreements that were made with SBC/Thintana way back when and mediocre reductions for the public.
Lyndall is the Ebola virus of SA telecoms, the next Jay Naidoo.