BTTB
Executive Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2004
- Messages
- 8,195
Thanks for clearing up your point Hamster.You misunderstood me. You said Reg 28 is a good thing because it brings diversification. I disagree because it concentrates your investments in South Africa which is a tiny spec in the global context.
There is no such thing as a Global 1200 RA in South Africa. What I meant is that I wish they'd do away with reg 28 and allow me to use something like ASHGEQ as an RA.
TL;DR: reg 28 is a handicap (for the most part)
Reg 28 has nothing to do with regards to whether or not an RA is managed by professionals or not. It is simply a bunch of rules telling you only 30% of your investmentd may go offshore, 5% or something must be cash/bonds, who can use it when etc.
You can build your own RA from a selection of funds you choose and "manage" yourself and still be reg 28 compliant. Just ask @supersunbird
There is the trick of buying dual listed shares who make their earnings outside of South Africa over and above the 30% offshore requirement. Billiton, Richemont, Anheuser-Busch etc.
Also the tax savings on RAs.
Last edited: