- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Messages
- 66,740
Does the government hold a stake in MTN? If not, what about the tsunamis?
Kaplan mentions Telkom's international links (especially via the SAT-3 fibre cable) as being potentially attractive to MTN.
"Maybe this is a way to for MTN to control its own destiny?" says Kaplan.
That boat has sailed and me thinks is set to sink hence Telkom -trying- to jump ship. It would however give mtn the ability to take on other countries in afriica better me thinks especially considering the higher cost along the west coast and the bigger markets like nigeria? hrm a nice optic spine up africa carrying bandwidth might work out quite well and they are the leader in africa me thinks interms of multiple countries.
Problem is this tho, can mtn buy Telkom when cell-c + vodacom, although not forced to go thru Telkom fixed lines, are mainly going thru it? I mean unless there is a seperation of the businesses mtn would have a huge advantage over other cell companies.
The fact is that without Vodacom, Telkodemonopolies would effectively be a somewhat "empty shell" [as mentioned in a news article a few days back]: apart from an aged local loop allegedly imminently facing unbundling, and SAT-3 [and SAFE] that is allegedly imminently being thrown open to Telkodemonopolies' competitors, Vodacom is the real shining jewel in Telkodemonopolies' lead [Pb] crown - the moment that 50% of Vodacom is sold off, Telkodemonopolies will lose a lot of its appeal - what will be left is a heavily-incompetent middle & top management, as well as a demotivated workforce that would love to work for NeeTel if NeeTel was prepared to employ thousands of people [which NeeTel is not prepared to do], and a lot of customers that will defect given half a chance...*Sigh* Its a pity MyADSL/MyBroadband can't buy telkom![]()
Is "the data division" a reference to Telkodemonopolies-SAIXHe supposes that there would, quite possible, be more sense in MTN buying certain parts of the fixed-line operation (like Telkom Business or the data division).
Ummm Telkodemonopolies is not exactly a shining example of a fixed line network operator - considering that this monopolistic beast has turned away millions of potential and existing customers, and has opted for an underdeveloped fixed line operation within SA - even Nigeria doesn't want Telkodemonopolies and is aware of the rampant incompetence.When considering Africa, Kaplan notes the major difference between South Africa and the rest of the continent is the underdeveloped fixed-line operations in countries outside of SA.
I disagree with these unnamed analysts:Analysts Moneyweb have spoken to over the past few weeks did not foresee competition problems. Kaplan agrees, saying that if Telkom was allowed to own 50% of cellular giant Vodacom, he could not see a problem with MTN owning a much smaller Telkom (ie, the fixed-line business).
Hmm, don't know exactly what to make of it. It might actually be a good thing. Overseas companies are not used to such huge profits and isn't there a limit as to how much return on investment can be "exported" to a foreign company. We may well see Vodacom investing more in the future rather than paying the shareholders, although Vodafone isn't exactly known for cheap prices overseas.
Does fixed line include national and international links? If so then MTN won't need to lay it's own links and will be in a good position to drive down the cost of mobile data and force others (vodacom) to self provision. Would love to see Telkom complain to MTN about the cost of data.
there will be huge regulatory and competition issues with such a deal and it will mess hugely with declarations of significant market power etc
...@ the end of the day this makes me very uncomfortable - feel a bit like a compulsive gambler watching a hide the pea (whatever - you know the three cups shifting around thing?) operator and knowing that, although i have to play, i have no chance of getting anything but screwed