<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">most ANC supporters have no idea how to use a computer<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I dont think this is a true statement, but if you are referring to the masses of poor black people, I might agree with you. I just hope the ANC has the foresight to use the Internet as a tool to help these people in their plans/manifesto. Im all for uplifting the poor. Thats why I stated before and I quote myself, "None of the pricing from telkom or sentech is aimed at the lower end of the market which I find shameful." At least give the schools cheap ADSL or MyWireless connections. It would not only be a good advert for telkom and sentech, but those students that learn from it will later perhaps become potential customers for telkom and sentech. You see Microsoft doing this all over the world. Why, because they want everybody to use Windows. Its good marketing. But I stress to the powers that be. Do not cross subsidise this in your pricing, rather let it come out of the Dept of Education's budget. Its the only legitimate way.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">h and of course deregulation implies privatisation - something that the ANC can't really do since their alliance beyatch COSATU would flip on them.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
You have a valid point here. If I was cosatu I would feel the same way. I also reckon if we had to go back in time and undo the telkom ballsup, I would of chosen a different model for our type of country with different needs to those in western countries. My plan would of excluded SBC and Telekom Malaysia. It would of been a South African Venture. Perhaps even of left telkom as it was. Rather used it as a tool to create employment, but this would of been worked around a completely different model. It would of been a friendly, cheap customer driven service with only SA interests at heart. The model would of been similar to South Korea. To use your telekom company to maximise the benefits for the people of SA. Its sole purpose was to provide the best and cheapest service to the public as a whole.
The fact that Telkom is partly owned by SBC and the State, it puts the state in a catch 22 situation. It has to honour its contract with the SBC consortium and at the same time provide services. SBC are business people with profit as their incentive. And this hardly helps SA development.
But in retrospect of all of the above of course. Its too late now. The only way out now is to throw the whole thing open to market forces. This will ensure competition and make it a more fair situation for all.
<b><hr noshade size="1"></b><font size="2"><font color="red"><b>You can take Telkom out of the Post Office but you can't take the Post Office out of Telkom.</b></font id="red"></font id="size2">