Eat my dust Sammy boy!
Celebration time for lament. He is out of the bottom 5
OK well he was![]()
...give me 2 min and I already fcked up.
Agg FFS, dropped 2 places again....
You guys just wait, when Woolworths clear their name from this Water Buffalo crap, the prices are going to soar!!, im going to laugh all the way to the bank!!
Damnit Shaun get back behind me - at least I am still ahead of Sam ^_^
Agg FFS, dropped 2 places again....
You guys just wait, when Woolworths clear their name from this Water Buffalo crap, the prices are going to soar!!, im going to laugh all the way to the bank!!
I should have went with gold, the prices dropped drastically the last 2 weeks, im sure there is only one way from here, and thats up!!
Wooles investors couldn't care about the water buffalo. Their concerns are more to do with stagnant growth prospects and margin squeezing as competitors tighten the perception gap. Woolies' value is artificial in terms of the market.
I doubt Woolies are going to be your saving grace. Nor any of the retailers for that matter. Even Mr Price is no longer the golden-boy it once was...
Woolies is a very good long term investment, look at their growth the last 5 years
but any negative news being released about a company and the share prices wil drop, same with good news,
For example, DataDanamics announces all there employees wil be getting Mac books, their share prices wil rise!, but over 2 weeks you read on the news DataDanamics can’t afford new Mac books, shares prices will drop, but you probably know all this....
Guys that wil do good with this game are people who has 4 screens open, just monitoring news.....
That is not sound logic when making an investment decision. Worldcom were also a great buy for many years and showed solid growth. Their past performance was not an indicator of future performance. Same principle rings true to this day.
If you want to forecast a company's long term growth then look at their current financial position, and their forward looking plans, strategies and positioning statements. Don't look backwards to attempt to extrapolate future growth. Not unless you have designed some sort of algorithmic trading model on your own?
Not true. Some stocks are far more resilient to traditional external pricing factors, and the market will always price in easily forecastable news/statements before they happen...
Well, that really isn't how it works at all, in terms of the specific examples you provided, and yes, I do understand that some news pertaining to the company, its industry, sector, the global market, export market, currencies etc have, to some degree, an impact on price. However not to the extent that you think, and not for all stocks.
Companies intentionally try to mitigate against their stock price swinging on news as it is a risk factor. Remember that their price dictates market capitalisation, so they want to be able to forecast it to some extent and they want less volatility. Ergo they hedge themselves against massive "news" or events, like currency movements, interest rate movements, their own stock price and many more, in the same way as they minimise transactional currency risk on imports through forward contracts and interest rate derivative products...
Not at all. Picks are final - there is no trading of a position at all. Even weightings are set in stone...
What are you moaning about??, you are in the 70ties with vodacom shares, try being ranked 101 out of 103
81 now.
Shows you, even when there is no cellphone involved Vodacom still finds a way to ruin my day![]()
patrick, are you including fees in the pricing methodology?
I ask because (cost price x shares) + cash = a few grand less than the initial capital amount, moments after the purchase. So is it priced at brokerage rates or direct access to market, and are costs included?