The Absurd Reason Why America Circumcises Baby Boys

Aghori

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
14,245
I call it the clitoral hood. What do you call it?

The clitoral hood is the female equivalent of the male foreskin. You should have read the entire thread before making sarcastic remarks.
 

noxibox

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
23,348
Amazing that people still try to defend the practice of male circumcision. Perhaps the most ridiculous thing I've seen to date is Jews accusing those opposed to the practice of being anti-Semitic.
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,881
I call it the clitoral hood. What do you call it?

The clitoris is the same as the male glans, during development in the womb we all started off as 'females', in men things just 'grew/developed' furher. Clitoris and glans is the same thing, clitoral hood and foreskin is the same thing. Type I FGM (removal of the clitoral hood) is no different to male circumcision.
 

Aghori

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
14,245
The clitoris is the same as the male glans, during development in the womb we all started off as 'females', in men things just 'grew/developed' furher. Clitoris and glans is the same thing, clitoral hood and foreskin is the same thing. Type I FGM (removal of the clitoral hood) is not different to male circumcision.

Joelus seems unable to grasp the basic understanding of this. I'm not sure if he is trolling or really is this ignorant sometimes.
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874
The clitoral hood is the female equivalent of the male foreskin. You should have read the entire thread before making sarcastic remarks.
The clitoris is the same as the male glans, during development in the womb we all started off as 'females', in men things just 'grew/developed' furher. Clitoris and glans is the same thing, clitoral hood and foreskin is the same thing. Type I FGM (removal of the clitoral hood) is no different to male circumcision.

It's not the same thing, it is homologous which simply means they develop from the same embryonic tissue.
I suppose you think that ovaries and testicles are the same thing too, since they are homologous?
 

Aghori

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
14,245
It's not the same thing, it is homologous which simply means they develop from the same embryonic tissue.
I suppose you think that ovaries and testicles are the same thing too, since they are homologous?

Go check a dictionary then come back to this thread. under "E" for equivalent.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,035
joelus, why are you against letting the kid in question decide when he's of age?
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874
The clitoris is the same as the male glans, during development in the womb we all started off as 'females', in men things just 'grew/developed' furher. Clitoris and glans is the same thing, clitoral hood and foreskin is the same thing. Type I FGM (removal of the clitoral hood) is no different to male circumcision.

Female:
No health benefits, only harm
FGM has no health benefits, and it harms girls and women in many ways. It involves removing and damaging healthy and normal female genital tissue, and interferes with the natural functions of girls' and women's bodies.

Immediate complications can include severe pain, shock, haemorrhage (bleeding), tetanus or sepsis (bacterial infection), urine retention, open sores in the genital region and injury to nearby genital tissue.

Long-term consequences can include:

recurrent bladder and urinary tract infections;
cysts;
infertility;
an increased risk of childbirth complications and newborn deaths;
the need for later surgeries. For example, the FGM procedure that seals or narrows a vaginal opening (type 3 above) needs to be cut open later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth. Sometimes it is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing and repeated both immediate and long-term risks.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/

Male:
Evidence shows that the inner skin of the foreskin is more likely to absorb HIV than any other skin as it is more prone to small tears during sex.

Within the foreskin, there are cells called Langerhans and other receptor cells that attract the HI virus.

Men who are not circumcised are also more likely to get other STIs such as genital ulcers (esp. Chancroid and Balanitis) that increases the risk for HIV infection.

Benefits of Male Circumcision

When the foreskin has been completely removed under medical conditions, from the head of the penis:

It is easier to keep clean.
It eliminates bruising and tearing during sex, which makes sex more enjoyable for men and women.
Cells that attract HIV have been removed.
It reduces the risk of HIV infection but there is still a 40% chance that circumcised men can get HIV.
Lower risk of STIs and diseases.
It provides health benefits for sexual partners - Medical male circumcision (MMC) is good for a women's health too as it reduces her risk to cervical cancer by removing the human papilloma virus that is often carried in the foreskin.
http://www.brothersforlife.org/medical-male-circumcision-mmc.html

Yes, it's exactly the same thing...
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874
joelus, why are you against letting the kid in question decide when he's of age?

I'm not against it at all. I just don't think there's anything wrong with the parents deciding to when he is a baby - there are many benefits to having it done as a baby

Adult circumcision is far more complex and has a much higher rate of complications than baby circumcision. It also deprives boys of the benefits during childhood and adolescence
 
Last edited:

Aghori

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
14,245
The foreskin is the male prepuce and the clitoral hood is the female prepuce.

Quit your trolling joelus.
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874
The foreskin is the male prepuce and the clitoral hood is the female prepuce.

Quit your trolling joelus.

Oh so disagreeing with Shaun108 is now trolling?

They are not the same thing, they are homologous. Just like the ovaries of female humans and the testicles of male humans are homologous
 

Keeper

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
23,624
I'm not against it at all. I just don't think there's anything wrong with the parents deciding to when he is a baby - there are many benefits to having it done as a baby

Are you against the priest sucking on your baby's dick though? Because they sometimes do that after circumcision in some churches.
Sometimes the baby dies too, from contracting herpes from the priest.

But hey, if you wanna slice off a part of your son's penis so he can look like you...go ahead. lucky for you this barbaric ritual is not banned yet.
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874
Are you against the priest sucking on your baby's dick though? Because they sometimes do that after circumcision in some churches.
Sometimes the baby dies too, from contracting herpes from the priest.

But hey, if you wanna slice off a part of your son's penis so he can look like you...go ahead. lucky for you this barbaric ritual is not banned yet.

Source to info about a baby dying from contracting herpes from a priest performing circumcision, please.

But anyway, no, I don't think it's a good idea...

Circumcision is not likely to be banned due to the health benefits but a priest sucking on your baby's dick is a different issue and should be banned imo
 
Last edited:

Nick333

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
35,114
What little health benefits circumcision provides is redundant when basic hygiene and responsibility is observed. Put another way circumcision only benefits dirty irresponsible people.
 

Sherbang

Executive Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
9,874
What little health benefits circumcision provides is redundant when basic hygiene and responsibility is observed. Put another way circumcision only benefits dirty irresponsible people.

AKA teenagers!
 

Nick333

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
35,114
Essentially advocating circumcision is promotion of poor hygiene and irresponsible behavior.
 
Top