I would like to know why you have a problem with banks.I'm stupid according to you, you want to listen to a stupid person?
I would like to know why you have a problem with banks.I'm stupid according to you, you want to listen to a stupid person?
I would like to know why you have a problem with banks.
So you have no problem with banks?what you would like is not my problem
Yes I agree violence is a problem, but sometimes nessecery if someone doesn't want to pay up. That's why we have police and stuff to make sure people stay civilised and honour contracts.
However that is all completely besides the point. You name dropped Krugman as a authority that agrees with you. Please show me where Krugman ever said usury is bad or central banks aren't necessary.
So you have no problem with banks?
Okay I give up.you have to show me where I said Krugman agrees with me, I already provided the context of why I quoted him
You are talking through your a$$.make your point
You are talking through your a$$.
I don't care whether they can speak English or not. Wouldn't even mind if they spoke no English at all and had a translator with them all the time. Would happily trade the language for some intelligenceThey act stupid, they speak stupid English and generally just be stupid on purpose. They think this will impress people. They think they are clever but by this tactic and that we will forgive them for this stupidity because stupid is the only resolve, the only backup they have, their only defense mechanism.
Okay I give up.
By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but [also] at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.
Yes and the authoritarian globalist view that as a good thing. They like their power to confiscate people's stuff, and believe it is justified.since you brought up Keynes
Yes and the authoritarian globalist view that as a good thing. They like their power to confiscate people's stuff, and believe it is justified.
I lean more towards liaise fiar free markets and the Austrians.
In anyway what has any of that got to do with this thread.*sigh*
In anyway what has any of that got to do with this thread.
Central banking isn't responsible for Southern Africa being a shîthole. We have one and we don't have oil so there's no attempts by the US to bring us some democracy
Yes gold in the ground. There's only one way to realise the riches from that. That is to dig it up and sell it.read the Keynes quote again, the last bit is the important bit, and wasn't South Africa like the richest country in terms of mineral wealth?
Yes gold in the ground. There's only one way to realise the riches from that. That is to dig it up and sell it.
You can buy physical, you know this?give people pieces of paper in return for the dug up stuff, sounds like a good deal
You can buy physical, you know this?
Nobody forces you to accept paper gold.
What point? Spell it out. You somehow think you have a claim to the gold in the ground and should profit from it without investing or doing any work to extract itcompletely missing the point, but understandable